Toyata Prius - energy and economically efficient.
Not true at all.
Prefer Ade's all around game and involvement but it's a no brainer who'd get the nod on Sunday
Toyata Prius - energy and economically efficient.
Not true at all.
Prefer Ade's all around game and involvement but it's a no brainer who'd get the nod on Sunday
Maribor were able to move through our midfield far too easily but did little with it. City would be expected to do more. So we can't play both.
Someone said in the match thread, play Ade because he has something to prove against City. I dislike the idea that players are playing within their capacity and can be motivated to play better or harder, but this could be a case where it works. Horses for courses.
I wouldn't play both against City or Arsenal, but in the league games following that it would be worth a shout, especially at home.
Actually a difficult choice between the two of them, before the game last night knowing that Ade was fit I would have gone with him, but Defoe scoring 3 makes it really difficult to drop him.
Will certainly be interesting to see what AVB does
Why can't we play Ade in the hole in place of Dempsey who offers absolutely nothing.
We can, see my post above.
Why can't we play Ade in the hole in place of Dempsey who offers absolutely nothing.
Not true at all.
Prefer Ade's all around game and involvement but it's a no brainer who'd get the nod on Sunday
Defoe got the goals, but if we put Dempsey (or Sig) in there instead of one of them, which team would be best? Picking strikers simply on goals scored is about as useful as rating keepers solely on their mistakes.
I have been left unimpressed by Dempsey but i will give him the benefit of the doubt that he is played out of position.
I have decided that we need both and for Adebayor to play a deep role, in the same way that Dempsey is meant to be playing. We need Defoe for goals and we need Adebayor for link up play.
Well we went with Dempsey