He’s either on gardening leave or it’s linked to Paratici’s return. Or it’s a combination of both, I’d hazard a guess at.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Scott Munn
- Thread starter tommysvr
- Start date
SirPercyHotspur
Andy Reid
Not sure when the 2025/26 PL handbook is published but when it is all the directors and other heads of departments will be published on our page. Expect we should hear about Munn before that though , as said before may be linked to whatever happens to Paratici.
He's gone, probably some timeline issue here (gardening leave or appointment of Paratici) before announcement
kb 1984
Ben Thatcher
Why are you so desperate to see him gone has he upset you in a previous life.
Gazza
Pedro Mendes
I think it’s the affiliated posti relationship. However regardless I don’t think he has the credentials to have the job in the first place
SpurMeUp
David Ginola
Remember the mole fiasco….
kb 1984
Ben Thatcher
I might agree with you if I had any idea what his job actually is.
lurker of old
Scott Parker
The papers said he has left so I guess nothing announced because he's on gardening leave and technically he is still employed...
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
I think we could require something productive from his gardening leave, to make up for the disappointment of his career with us. Some potatoes and lettuces for the canteen perhaps
Finney Is Back
Chris Jones
As I said when Munn first joined us.
I still can’t see why Levy employed Munn at Spurs.
Muttley
Tim Sherwood
Ang on. Didn't we just win a trophy on his watch?
He was our Chief Football Officer when we lifted the trophy.
Bishop
Steffen Iversen
I'm not pro or anyone the appointment I just don't understand why he's catching all the flack re Ange? If it's a case of following the corporate hierarchy, should Levy not be getting an equal amount criticism for hiring him the first place?
Why is Munn one chance and done, but everyone else gets to make repeated failings?
Best interpretation is -> he doubled down on the mistake
The signs were there at end of last season, the club must have had reflection points pre/post January window. In every one of those reflection points, evaluations, a decision had to be made, stick or change.
The reasonable interpretation (and I said it before the cup win, before end of season) is, Levy (historical data suggests) would likely have been inclined to change, the fact he didn't mean someone else in the senior leadership was backing (stuck their neck out for) Ange, logic says Munn.
I've been in those decisions at bigger levels, you live or die by that call. I suspect some part of Munn's pitch was the results would improve post January when players returned from injury, and with the addition of Danso, Kinsky, Tel.
Add in new CEO coming in, his role was probably up for review anyway (new guy can always out to bring his own), pretty easy to see the why.
Muttley
Tim Sherwood
Exactly.
Like Ange, it doesn't make it the right decision but it probably is. As you say, the politics and stakes are high at that level. We just have to trust that the employer / employee engagement model saw things that us fans couldn't.
kb 1984
Ben Thatcher
Based on what. you didn't like his work in Australia, Asia or his work for the city group or you just dislike him because he is Munn which is a bit harsh but understandable as very one has someone they don't like.