• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Roberto Soldado

Charlie Austin.
Fair enough. I would actually like to see us bring in BOTH Austin and Berahino as I think they have different attributes. I see Austin as a player who could play as a number 9 instead of Kane, whereas Berahino could play alongside Kane as a 9, 10 or even as wide forward.
The fact that we could probably get Austin and Berahino for a combined amount similar to what Liverpool paid for Benteke makes it even better business IMO.
 
Fair enough. I would actually like to see us bring in BOTH Austin and Berahino as I think they have different attributes. I see Austin as a player who could play as a number 9 instead of Kane, whereas Berahino could play alongside Kane as a 9, 10 or even as wide forward.
The fact that we could probably get Austin and Berahino for a combined amount similar to what Liverpool paid for Benteke makes it even better business IMO.

I think if Ade & Bobby are gone, we need two ..
 
Charlie Austins attitude is better IMO. I don't rate SB but think Austin could easily fit in alongside Kane.
 
Charlie Austins attitude is better IMO. I don't rate SB but think Austin could easily fit in alongside Kane.
Why would Austin (a player who plays in the same position as Kane) fit in alongside Kane better than someone who already has a good bit of experience in successfully playing alongside Kane and is used to playing either side of a player like Kane?
 
Even if we do, would they be such a brilliant pairing anyway? I doubt it, they are to similar.

No i agree, if we were going to go with 2 then Kane & Berahino would be the best pairing. Austin would be good as an alternative to Kane, however are we gonna pay £15m + wages for someone who will be 2nd choice?
 
Soldado could do with a mention occasionally, especially in his own thread
Soldado already gets discussed in the Townsend thread, since he is now going to be our new winger, haha. When that fails watch out for his name getting mentioned in the Lloris thread, for when we will try him in goal the season after...
 
Soldado already gets discussed in the Townsend thread, since he is now going to be our new winger, haha. When that fails watch out for his name getting mentioned in the Lloris thread, for when we will try him in goal the season after...
Why would we change formations to play with wingers just to include Soldado?

If he's to play anywhere other than striker I'd expect it to be as an inside forward.
 
Are we changing formations then? I wouldnt think we would all of a sudden start playing with 2 strikers.

We wouldn't. Kane up top with Austin on the bench as back up. SB is a striker too so no difference between him and Austin I happen to think Austin is better.
 
We wouldn't. Kane up top with Austin on the bench as back up. SB is a striker too so no difference between him and Austin I happen to think Austin is better.
Berahino often plays as an inside forward and could play instead of Lamela or Chadli whilst being capable of playing backup to Kane.

AFAIK Austin has never played anywhere other than striker. So there's a huge amount of difference - it's about far more than just who you think makes a better striker.
 
We wouldn't. Kane up top with Austin on the bench as back up. SB is a striker too so no difference between him and Austin I happen to think Austin is better.
There is a difference though. Berahino can also play on the wings, so will get a lot more game-time than Austin would. And the wings aren't exactly our strongest position either. In fact, if we were to buy a striker like Austin, then we still need to buy a winger as well imo. Berahino however can solve both those problem areas.
 
Back