• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Levy's Plan

Don't waste your breath.
Levy = bad
No Levy = good
Some of the comments about how much better it is without him are laughable. Let's just see how it plays out.
This summer doesn’t happen without Levy’s vision and work. We’d be in a similar position to Saudi Sportswashing Machine and Villa without him. The people currently running the club have a platform to do what they’re doing because of Levy regardless of what you make of his 25 years in charge.
 
This summer doesn’t happen without Levy’s vision and work. We’d be in a similar position to Saudi Sportswashing Machine and Villa without him. The people currently running the club have a platform to do what they’re doing because of Levy regardless of what you make of his 25 years in charge.

Well said, i know there are a some fans [ especially the CFT mob] that blame him for our troubles but i honestly believe we are a much better posistion then when he first got here.
 
You said 6-7 years

Well if you include Poch’s last full season then yes we did finish 4th. But my point was it’s been by and large a downward trajectory since we sacked him, only one top 4 finish and finishing in the bottom half. Unless you think the league finishes I highlighted constitute progress?
 
Well if you include Poch’s last full season then yes we did finish 4th. But my point was it’s been by and large a downward trajectory since we sacked him, only one top 4 finish and finishing in the bottom half. Unless you think the league finishes I highlighted constitute progress?

Of course you include Poch’s last year if you are going back 7 years. Which is the time period you set.
 
Well even so it’s 2 top 4 finishes in 7 years. I ask again is that progress on what Poch delivered in terms of league finishes?

on what Poch Delivered? Did that have nothing to do with Levy then?

Because that means what came after Poch had nothing to do with Levy either.

But you ain’t gonna agree with that are you?

Let me ask you a question.

Apart from the Levy era when in a 7 year period did we finish top four more than twice.

I’m guessing in the 60s and maybe … maybe the 80s. If so two decades out of our history match up levy’s worst period… are you getting it yet?
 
on what Poch Delivered? Did that have nothing to do with Levy then?

Because that means what came after Poch had nothing to do with Levy either.

But you ain’t gonna agree with that are you?

Let me ask you a question.

Apart from the Levy era when in a 7 year period did we finish top four more than twice.

I’m guessing in the 60s and maybe … maybe the 80s. If so two decades out of our history match up levy’s worst period… are you getting it yet?

Of course it had something to do with Levy. He’s partly responsible when we succeed and when we fail.

I already mentioned previous eras where we achieved multiple top four finishes, and trophies.

The question you keep refusing to answer, are the league finishes 4th, 6th, 7th, 4th, 8th, 5th, 17th what progression looks like? Should Levy have had a lifetime pass because he improved upon his predecessor?

I don’t think there’s any question that we went backwards since Poch left from a football standpoint but you clearly disagree. Finishing outside of the top 4 more frequently than we finished inside it including a 17th place finish is clearly an improvement on what Poch (and Levy) had achieved previously.
 
Of course it had something to do with Levy. He’s partly responsible when we succeed and when we fail.

I already mentioned previous eras where we achieved multiple top four finishes, and trophies.

The question you keep refusing to answer, are the league finishes 4th, 6th, 7th, 4th, 8th, 5th, 17th what progression looks like? Should Levy have had a lifetime pass because he improved upon his predecessor?

I don’t think there’s any question that we went backwards since Poch left from a football standpoint but you clearly disagree. Finishing outside of the top 4 more frequently than we finished inside it including a 17th place finish is clearly an improvement on what Poch (and Levy) had achieved previously.

Of course we regressed from where we were 7 years ago.

I’m just saying even in that 7 year period of regression in the league it was still one of our best 7 year periods in terms of league finishes in our entire history.

And I strongly believe that Levy would have turned it around and had us competing again.

I don’t have that faith in this lot… who have made terrible football decisions and this summer have thrown a lot of the clubs future revenue to back a manager that I like but has not proved himself here… or anywhere else for that matter. While selling some top young prospects

I’m a spurs fan so I obviously hope it works out. But it’s risky.
 
on what Poch Delivered? Did that have nothing to do with Levy then?

Because that means what came after Poch had nothing to do with Levy either.

But you ain’t gonna agree with that are you?

Let me ask you a question.

Apart from the Levy era when in a 7 year period did we finish top four more than twice.

I’m guessing in the 60s and maybe … maybe the 80s. If so two decades out of our history match up levy’s worst period… are you getting it yet?
50s, 60s and 80s (3 out of 5 ‘pre Levy’ decades that Spurs spent in the top division).
 
So in other words in our entire 143 year history we only bettered (in terms of league finishes) Levy’s worst 7 year period only 3 times.
Since Spurs became a regular top division club in 1950. We have had 4 decades in which we achieved 3 or more top 4 finishes in a 7year period.

3 out of 5 decades pre Levy and 1 out of 3 decades (actually 2.5 to be fair to him) with Levy, So 60% versus 40%

Though we won 12 trophies in those 5 pre Levy decades (@2.4 per decade) versus 2 (@ 0.8 per decade) with Levy at the reigns.
 
Since Spurs became a regular top division club in 1950. We have had 4 decades in which we achieved 3 or more top 4 finishes in a 7year period.

3 out of 5 decades pre Levy and 1 out of 3 decades (actually 2.5 to be fair to him) with Levy, So 60% versus 40%

Though we won 12 trophies in those 5 pre Levy decades (@2.4 per decade) versus 2 (@ 0.8 per decade) with Levy at the reigns.

I love how you are trying to frame it within the time period you want only, didn’t we finish top 2 or 3 in the 20s and 30s? So not like we were non league until the 50s

We were talking about 7 year periods that @Jurgen the German set as a time scale but you changed it to decades.

Let me put it another way under Levy we had 7 top four finishes in our entire history before that…. Just 8.

I might have to double check that stat… because fùck me

If that stat is correct, then in our entire history Levy’s reign accounted for almost half of our top 4 finishes.
 
Last edited:
I love how you are trying to frame it within the time period you want only, didn’t we finish top 2 or 3 in the 20s and 30s? So not like we were non league until the 50s

We were talking about 7 year periods that @Jurgen the German set as a time scale but you changed it to decades.

Let me put it another way under Levy we had 7 top four finishes in our entire history before that…. Just 8.

I might have to double check that stat… because fùck me

If that stat is correct, then in our entire history Levy’s reign accounted for almost half of our top 4 finishes.
Its like 9 top 4 finishes since the 6s before DL and 7 after. So yeh, more or less in the time frames used he accounted for just under 50% of them in 25 years instead of 40.

Was a relegation in there too
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
Back