thfcsteff
Fanny Walden
Pre Covid it was very much a lefty viewpoint as well.
We've had this exchange before. Your framing is disingenuous.
Pre Covid it was very much a lefty viewpoint as well.
We've had this exchange before. Your framing is disingenuous.
I never said it was exclusive to the CDC. You asked “I never once saw a claim that the vaccine would make it impossible to transmit covid” and I provided various examples.
Is that the best you can do? Seriously?
In your opinion*
You seem more interested in winning arguements than actual discussions at the moment. Let me know when that changes.
https://historyofvaccines.org/vacci...-vaccines/history-anti-vaccination-movements/
Yeah. Very much a lefty viewpoint...
...BTW, if you're referring to the homeopathic hippy-driven '70s vaccine skeptics, they weren't specificallty vaccine skeptci, they just didn't believe on western medicine. Libertarians were also a major part of the anti-vaccine school. Both came from different perspectives. BTW, if you understood hippy culture, you'd know it was based around self-consciousness and individual freedom/escape. As I told you, I grew up with hippy parents.
That is cowardly gaslighting of the grossest order Rob.
That does not appear to be the same interview.
...creepy....It is more the creey assholes she has platformed on her show - Phil and Oz.
What does it feel like to be caught BSing so effin often? You should honestly take a break.
I actually liked Fauci during Covid and generally felt that he was doing his best in an incredibly difficult and unprecedented situation. I don’t think he was acting maliciously, and I respected the fact that he was trying to give people guidance during a frightening time. That said, I think some of the policies he supported turned out to be mistakes, particularly prolonged lockdowns, school closures, and some of the broader restrictions that had significant social, educational and economic consequences. In hindsight, I think there should have been a greater willingness to acknowledge the uncertainty in the evidence, consider the wider costs of restrictions, and adjust policies more quickly as we learned more about the virus. I can respect Fauci’s intentions while still believing that some of the decisions made during Covid were wrong.
He also explicitly wrote about his extraordinary new level of fame in his diary and described himself as potentially one of the most recognisable people in the world. I’d argue that as evidence that he became preoccupied with his celebrity.
I actually liked Fauci during Covid and generally felt that he was doing his best in an incredibly difficult and unprecedented situation. I don’t think he was acting maliciously, and I respected the fact that he was trying to give people guidance during a frightening time. That said, I think some of the policies he supported turned out to be mistakes, particularly prolonged lockdowns, school closures, and some of the broader restrictions that had significant social, educational and economic consequences. In hindsight, I think there should have been a greater willingness to acknowledge the uncertainty in the evidence, consider the wider costs of restrictions, and adjust policies more quickly as we learned more about the virus. I can respect Fauci’s intentions while still believing that some of the decisions made during Covid were wrong.
He also explicitly wrote about his extraordinary new level of fame in his diary and described himself as potentially one of the most recognisable people in the world. I’d argue that as evidence that he became preoccupied with his celebrity.
I think the ultimate question was how aware Fauci was on some of these policys would be and were being implemented.
If 6 feet apart was just a guideline with no real scientific thought behind it, once you start seeing people being arrested for not adhering, you has the person that ultimaltey came up with that policy should be willing to step up and speak out against that.
Fauci did NOT come up with that policy. It came from the CDC, not the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
I think Fauci was wrong to say it 'sort of came up' as a number. There was a clear reason 6ft was originally chosen.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/scienc...for-social-distancing-heres-what-science-says
Personally, I did what was requested generally and applied my own common sense i.e. when on a woodland path with no-one around, I did not wear a mask. When on that woodland path, if someone came by I'd put my mask on out of courtesy. When in stores I would wear a mask and try to keep distance, again to support the idea of social mandates. Despite my own (frankly ignorant!!!!) feeling that it was just a very a strong flu, I simply did not know enough to challenge my own assumptions with anything resembling fact, so I made a choice to listen to specific health bodies and experts. I put my trust in the CDC.
Fauci did NOT come up with that policy. It came from the CDC, not the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
I think Fauci was wrong to say it 'sort of came up' as a number. There was a clear reason 6ft was originally chosen.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/scienc...for-social-distancing-heres-what-science-says
Personally, I did what was requested generally and applied my own common sense i.e. when on a woodland path with no-one around, I did not wear a mask. When on that woodland path, if someone came by I'd put my mask on out of courtesy. When in stores I would wear a mask and try to keep distance, again to support the idea of social mandates. Despite my own (frankly ignorant!!!!) feeling that it was just a very a strong flu, I simply did not know enough to challenge my own assumptions with anything resembling fact, so I made a choice to listen to specific health bodies and experts. I put my trust in the CDC.
Fauci did NOT come up with that policy. It came from the CDC, not the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases.
I think Fauci was wrong to say it 'sort of came up' as a number. There was a clear reason 6ft was originally chosen.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/scienc...for-social-distancing-heres-what-science-says
Personally, I did what was requested generally and applied my own common sense i.e. when on a woodland path with no-one around, I did not wear a mask. When on that woodland path, if someone came by I'd put my mask on out of courtesy. When in stores I would wear a mask and try to keep distance, again to support the idea of social mandates. Despite my own (frankly ignorant!!!!) feeling that it was just a very a strong flu, I simply did not know enough to challenge my own assumptions with anything resembling fact, so I made a choice to listen to specific health bodies and experts. I put my trust in the CDC.
Ultimately the world over implemented these guidelines, witch hunting one guy for it seems like its just that
He came up with them, governments went over the score in implementation of them, that's not his fault.
I don't buy the over implementation as a "control" conspiracy either, I suspect that as each government went slightly harder another one went slightly further and it turned into a snowball that they lost control of.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.