• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sandro Tonali

Simons and Tel (on the logic that Son and Hojbjerg effectively paid for Kudus)
Don’t pay for anyone up front unless you trying to do an impossible deal
I mean I know where it went in reality and it was to pay debt due on previous transfers, and possibly the ones you refer too
But the question is that when you borrow against future earnings you then don’t get those earnings to spend in the future
 
That loan on future earnings was odd

Very
Shows a poor poor financial position and then some
Especially as they also dropped £100m in not that long after
Borrowing money from the future is never good BUT if you've got cashflow issues maybe you had little choice. Be interesting to know if one of the £100m they've injected has settled that loan as the interest rate was way above our other borrowings.
 
Of course, just shows we are not in great financial health when needing a bumper summer
If we are overhauling the squad as much as it looks...I think the final summer outlay doesn't have to net out at that higher figure (£100m?) ....the problem we have is selling clubs know we want an overhaul, are looking to make a statement and kick start our fortunes again...and they're charging/quoting us accordingly.

Then as we are front loading our purchases first...we then are up against a ticking clock to shift quite a number of players in sales (especially given we don't need a bloated squad for a Europeless season) ...so once again will we get the prices we want? ...or back into a semi forced sale?
 
Back