• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Pedro Porro

I am on the fence with Porro, 50 million is a decent chunk of money for a player that can't really defend consistently well, however it would be weakening our first team and who do you get in to replace him that is as good/better?

If that player was out there, wouldnt City be after them?
Erm...Spence.
 
He's better defensively, significantly so. Offensively I agree but the gap isn't as big as the defensive gap imo.
Think Porro showed in RDZs games he can defend when needed, He is never going to be a great defender, but I think under a proper manager with standards he might switch back on.

I am torn on selling him, as 50 million is a lot for a player with 2 years left, but we have to replace him properly.
 
Back