• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Gallagher is a better player than Johnson.

Souza is a better player than …….

We got better in the window.

Except Danso, Richi, Bentancur, Davies, VDV all got injured in that timeframe

- Souza won't play
- Gallagher effectively replaces Bentancur
- No wing replacement for Johnson
- No goals replacement for Johnson

No way we have come out stronger
 
Devine or Donley would have been great if Kulu isn't going to be back imminently. Someone to spare Simons from being our only creative midfielder. Maybe the pennies being saved on their wages was too tempting?

I'm sure we are paying gallagher and souza more than we are saving on wages from 2 of our loan players.
 
Could be worse i suppose…

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

this is the thing

most clubs are closer to this than they admit

City were in that state not long ago

no amount of success in the future is worth going through that
 
A good listen which is sensible on why we find ourselves in such a general mess.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Jesus Christ, he said no such thing. He was quite respectful of Tottenham in the direct quotes.

For those who haven’t seen it, on three occasions he was quoted as saying Fiorentin’s owners were “serious owners”. It seems he said that not in conjunction with Tottenham in any way. If you read between the lines, he may have been having a go at us or he may just have been saying he was impressed with them.
 
Jesus Christ, he said no such thing. He was quite respectful of Tottenham in the direct quotes.

For those who haven’t seen it, on three occasions he was quoted as saying Fiorentin’s owners were “serious owners”. It seems he said that not in conjunction with Tottenham in any way. If you read between the lines, he may have been having a go at us or he may just have been saying he was impressed with them.

He said more about how we had stood by him through tough times.
 
But if you say - 'I moved to Fiorentina because their owners were serious', it's automatically juxtaposing against where you've left for not having serious owners.
I think Paratici is saying "I moved to Fiorentina because I wanted to move back to Italy and I couldn't get in at a bigger club like Milan or whatever so I've ended up in the city of love so I can spend quality time with my new girlfriend..."
 
I think Paratici is saying "I moved to Fiorentina because I wanted to move back to Italy and I couldn't get in at a bigger club like Milan or whatever so I've ended up in the city of love so I can spend quality time with my new girlfriend..."
He turned down Milan 6 months ago when he thought he'd be working with Levy, rather than the Nepos
 
Jesus Christ, he said no such thing. He was quite respectful of Tottenham in the direct quotes.

For those who haven’t seen it, on three occasions he was quoted as saying Fiorentin’s owners were “serious owners”. It seems he said that not in conjunction with Tottenham in any way. If you read between the lines, he may have been having a go at us or he may just have been saying he was impressed with them.

Yeh annoying how this has been twisted into him slagging of Spurs.
 
Back