Bournemouth aswell.Reminiscent of Fulham away last season.
That said if we lose to Sunderland on Sunday and the stadium is booing, who knows how the board will react.
i don't disagree about TF not being proactive fluidI never saw them as proactive fluid. I always saw them as a fluid counter attacking team. 24/25 a lot of teams were disjointed. Liverpool effectively ran away with the title -but only managed 84pts, Palace, Forest, Brighton, Brentford, Fulham were challenging for top6. I don't mean to take away from TF because of that, but I always saw them as counter attacking, and could see why Wissa and Mbuemo scored plenty of goals, and Damsgaard get plenty of assists.
But I think TF will cause an opinion split between the fans. I'm absolutely anti-pragmatic football, but that's cos Spurs and Barca are the teams I loved when I got into football and it wasn't pragmatic. However, if we showed anything about what TF wants to do then I could get on board, but right now I just see massive inconsistency. We still look like we can't see defend, and we still look like we can't attack - yet somehow get goals. Something has to improve.
i don't disagree about TF not being proactive fluid
i meant that TF knows how to build a fluid counter attacking team
he needs the right players and kudus is the only one that fits the bill right now.
- odobert, tel, muani - too young and inexperienced
- richy - no dependable for hold up and support play and doesn't know how to lose his marker
- simons - getting better but still below expectations
- paulinha - can break up but can't support attack
hopefully owners and management would have seen enough to get reinforcements
a tricky subject with solanke, kulu and maddison out and returning - do we buy experienced and see their values go down? or risk points by waiting for them.
no, we must hold TF accountable for improving players. however, also its necessary for transfers to have a minimum level of quality so that he has the time and space to improve playersA huge part of Frank's appointment was the idea that he could improve players. Have we just given up on that and decided to transfer our way out?
We definitely need players to increase the quality of the squad. Hopefully, the returning players can give us a boostno, we must hold TF accountable for improving players. however, also its necessary for transfers to have a minimum level of quality so that he has the time and space to improve players
A huge part of Frank's appointment was the idea that he could improve players. Have we just given up on that and decided to transfer our way out?
Jesus, that's harsh. It was a hard watch and these people have given up New Year's evening and their money to watch that brick. But still...Reminiscent of Fulham away last season.
From what I could tell at the game last night, the only saving grace is that the flak from the fans is directed at the manager and not the players. I think the fans can see that it is the tactics that are so frustratingly negative. If (I know it is a MASSIVE if) Frank stops the safety first, low block, don't pass through the centre, horseshoe ball then I think the fans would get behind him. If the club jettison Frank and bring in someone who is less negative then I think the fans would be behind them and the team as well.Jesus, that's harsh. It was a hard watch and these people have given up New Year's evening and their money to watch that brick. But still...
Frank must surely realise that he's walked into a bit of a basket case of a club where expectations outweigh resources and the "family" feel he instilled at Brentford won't cut it here without being underpinned by successful and good football.
The away fans were great at Selhurst. But maybe that was because we were leading/winning.Bournemouth aswell.
You lose the away fans, you lose the club unfortunately.
Another manager likely to be gone cool
Some club this
The away fans were great at Selhurst. But maybe that was because we were leading/winning.
Think it shows the 'style' thing runs deep though with us. As booing a draw is slightly ridiculous (in context), especially against a team that have given away little to visitors this season.
So. We deserve what WE want not what Frank wants? So, quelle surprise, a divide.
From what I could tell the fans were not booing the result. They were booing negativity of the performance. Vicario was booked for time wasting at 0-0 in the 60th minute. The great Bill Nicholson will be turning in his grave.The away fans were great at Selhurst. But maybe that was because we were leading/winning.
Think it shows the 'style' thing runs deep though with us. As booing a draw is slightly ridiculous (in context), especially against a team that have given away little to visitors this season.
So. We deserve what WE want not what Frank wants? So, quelle surprise, a divide.
From what I could tell the fans were not booing the result. They were booing negativity of the performance. Vicario was booked for time wasting at 0-0 in the 60th minute. The great Bill Nicholson will be turning in his grave.
No I expect him to do thay over a period longer than 4 months.
But we need upgrades on Bentancur, Richy/Solanke and a LW winger who isn't a kid.
Thay still gives scope to improve Odobert as an understudy, Gray (who looks sharper) and Bergvall.
Some elders are clearly beyond saving so I would replace and concentrate on improving the youth
I agree that 4 months isn't enough, but we have to expect more than this surely? Even our worst managers were at least good in the beginning.
I expect more, but its not much more mate and I am not over egging that. And yeh look others have had good starts but then declined because of variations of the same reasons.
As I keep saying, fine to get rid of Frank, but the basis of all managers decline and struggles at Spurs remain the same and unless that changes its going to the be narrative of the next couple also
I've been arguing that point for about 18 months. Frank was a pointless appointment, but this is what the majority of the fanbase and the board wanted, no? Ange's last 18 months were all about a plan B and being more pragmatic. We got what we wished for. And like I've said all along, we'll sack Frank and bounce back in the other direction yet again. An attacking manager that we won't fully commit to, sack him and get a pragmatist again.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.