I think the club inc him would have loved both players but I assume (guess) we put a cap on how much we would pay for bothIf Mr Paratici was involved do you think it would have been Eze OR Savinho rather than both? He does like doing multiple deals at once and then pulling out of the less favourable ones if we get our top target?
If they were for the same position, I reckon you could be absolutely on the money. But Eze and Savinho would fill different positions so there's reason to hope that it really is both.If Mr Paratici was involved do you think it would have been Eze OR Savinho rather than both? He does like doing multiple deals at once and then pulling out of the less favourable ones if we get our top target?
Er…I'm not sure about this. He's obviously a good player. But he's also very much a dribbling right winger. Quite similar to the one we bought for £60m a month ago. He's not much of a passer, and he's very one-footed. The balance just doesn't seem right with Kudus already here.
Not according to his statistics and the way City fans want him gone as they wanted Rodrygo and feel Bobb is the better player. I think he would be decent for us but no better than Odobert IMO.I think this is the one we really need
Kudus and Eze put us back to par in terms of Son's aging/departure and Maddison's injury.
To me Savinho is what puts us on the front foot for the top 5 again. A real difference maker
A week of solid youtube has sold me!
Pep's mate trying to bump up the cost
Pep's mate trying to bump up the cost
One slight problem with that suggestion....Guess we go for rodrygo then.
That smacks of one side trying to force or hurry a move and briefing a journo to put out a story.
You talking about Savio playing 10?A week of solid youtube has sold me!
But really i think it’s the idea of him as well as a passing 10, not instead of one. And also the idea of Tel being shaped into a 9 medium term
NahThat smacks of one side trying to force or hurry a move and briefing a journo to put out a story.
You talking about Savio playing 10?
I like Odobert, I think of our existing options he should be the one getting the lions share of the LWF starts, however to suggest there's no difference between them currently suggests you haven't watched much of the pair. There is a significant performance level difference between the pair along with the actual statistical difference. To say that Savio is no better right now than Odobert is a wild statement to make and I like Odobert and think he has really good potential.Not according to his statistics and the way City fans want him gone as they wanted Rodrygo and feel Bobb is the better player. I think he would be decent for us but no better than Odobert IMO.
I was going to reply the same but thought it so ridiculous I didn't bother. A guy that featured in most of Emirates Marketing Project's Premier League and Champions League games last season is the same level as a guy who can barely get minutes for us with our inferior forward line. Go figure....I like Odobert, I think of our existing options he should be the one getting the lions share of the LWF starts, however to suggest there's no difference between them currently suggests you haven't watched much of the pair. There is a significant performance level difference between the pair along with the actual statistical difference. To say that Savio is no better right now than Odobert is a wild statement to make and I like Odobert and think he has really good potential.
I'm thinking more of the dynamic in the rodrygo saga.Nah
It’s them saying this is the fee we need
Us saying ha ha
This is what he is worth
And them going bye bye
Everyone worked RodrygoI'm thinking more of the dynamic in the rodrygo saga.
If Mr Paratici was involved do you think it would have been Eze OR Savinho rather than both? He does like doing multiple deals at once and then pulling out of the less favourable ones if we get our top target?