-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)
- Thread starter SpurMeUp
- Start date
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
Completely fair point.
That bloke is fudging dangerous.
That bloke is fudging dangerous.
SpurMeUp
Tommy Harmer
Thing is...while liberals who don't like him find this abhorent...many who find politics dull and stuck find this refreshing. Is he dangerous? Who knows! Least of all him!
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
If you fear social conservatism (which I do too), your fears are better placed on someone more competent.
Johnson is a Trump. And Trump is fine because he's not one of the competent dead eye fudgers like Paul Ryan.
Things like this are important to pay attention to: https://righttolife.org.uk/news/tory-leadership-candidates-abortion-2019/
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
I just cant imagine people would put him in that position.
If he becomes PM then the whole system needs tearing down.
I dont fear any particular ideology, I do fear a man who has shown he will change the course of history just to service his own ego. Just as I fear a man who would do that and then go on to display such a complete lack of intelligence, sense, respect...
He is dangerous.
SpurMeUp
Tommy Harmer
Ahem the only reason Boris has a realistic shot at PM is because of those who believed the ‘whole system needs tearing down’. Just like No Deal was never on the table Boris was a joke who’d never run the party or nation.
Now with Farage and Brexit he is the ‘solution’!
Careful what you wish for.
Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Dirt shows best in the light. He won't last 2 months as PM before a scandal brings him down. It will be as easy as destroying the BNP by simply giving them a chair on Question Time one week
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
I absolutely agree with the first.
But with the second, we don't live in a presidential country. We elect a manifesto and a local MP - that's it. A prime minister is just what it says - the first of equals. They only get one vote out of 650, the same as anyone else
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
As with GB, I agree with the first but absolutely no the second. We dont vote for a PM, we vote for a party and a manifesto.
It defies belief that anyone who is serious about anything would look at Boris as a solution, as a leader, a figurehead - the public fact of a party....
...its unbelievable people could go for it.
That said, look at Trump....
As I said - look at Trump. Boris would be ours, and I suspect just as hard to remove.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
A simple vote of no confidence brings ours down. All it needs is for something like 20 of his own party to vote against him.
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
And how did that go last time?
There isnt enough talent in the Tory party to offer a credible alternative.
Boris would Trump it up big time, normalise insane and bigoted comments to the point where people just accept it.
There isnt enough talent in the Tory party to offer a credible alternative.
Boris would Trump it up big time, normalise insane and bigoted comments to the point where people just accept it.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
May has been crap, not dangerous. I do have enough faith in the integrity of most MPs to bring down one of their own who crosses certain decency lines.
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
I didnt say she was dangerous, only that Boris would be.
The point was - May was crap, a no confidence vote was made, and she is still there. So your "simple vote of no confidence brings ours down" line really isnt as absolute as you might hope.
The point was - May was crap, a no confidence vote was made, and she is still there. So your "simple vote of no confidence brings ours down" line really isnt as absolute as you might hope.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Interesting that Mordaunt has just said she's not standing, and is backing Hunt instead. The only Brexiteer in cabinet not backing Johnson
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
I just meant the mechanism is there to prevent excesses. Whereas you need impeachment to bring down a president.
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
The mechanism may be there, but its far from simple/straightforward for it to be used successfully.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
That's their lack of education then, and not a reason to debase a perfectly good system into a reality tv style personality contest
monkeybarry
Dimitar Berbatov
As horrible as it is, Johnson is the next step in rearranging the system (not bringing it down - too apocalyptic).
We have tried the democratic version of taking back control and sovereignty.
Now it's time to try the celebrity version. Let's not forget that without HIGNFY he would be just another backbenchers with silly hair.
As soon as he became a caricature he gained ultimate power
Realistically him and Hanrooster are the only people who would probably build something in the long term that could possibly lead to a GE win but the others are just obsessed with Brexit so will only focus on that.
Weird thing about Boris is that when he was mayor he was actually really popular in what is a mainly Labour city, managed to be fairly liberal and business friendly but ever since the referendum he's completely changed.
wiziwig
Steed Malbranque
I had an hour, so I thought I'd have a little fun and respond to @AuroRaman 's inane BuzzFeed piece which pushes that only the whites of christian heritage are inherently evil. I suspect you think much the same and think rich powerful Jews are incapable of such vengeful desires for the European pogroms and the mass killings during the second world war. All the evidence you need that they don't have vengeful desires are to be found in the kill ratio in their response to a terrorist attack on their nation.
In reply to the rest of your post , long winded I know, but....
I have been against military interventions in Muslim countries as far back as my school days, arguing against my history teacher's defence of the British intervention in the Suez ... My heart sank when the Gulf War 1 happened, likewise when the 911 and the subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the early noughties ..
In 2003 I had time off work due to a leg injury and during my recuperation, for the first time I sat at a computer to vent my feelings on the subject...I did this through my then AOL and ATT accounts, where there were a hive of activity on the political forums.. I opposed both the jingoists, and also the Liberals with their pitfall regime change arguments on humanitarian grounds. For my opposition on the forums, I received numerous death threats via my email. AOL could not trace who had sent them so I decided not to cause anymore more upset to the wife and stopped my postings - family comes first and all that. Although Geo-politics is the great unsolved puzzle, my views are instinctively and will always be against military interventions.
I warned back then, of the repercussions of these regime changing adventures, some serious blowback in the shape of Muslim terrorism in Europe and that it would lead to mass migrations of people... I'm not the idiot that you and your mates on here think I am, perhaps an idiot, but not your idiot as I do understand the survival instinct the human species!
"It should be the priority of every man to his ensure his living space is free from existential threats so that his woman can give birth to his offspring in safety." ....It's such a simple, obvious statement, but so profoundly important..
I thought about writing much of the remaining part of my post, into the D Day Remembrance thread but then, I thought perhaps one or two of the usual suspects would see it as me tinkling on the thread...
Auroman asked what I thought were a good question, regarding ancestry.
Having spent many years in London's East End areas I got to know many English people who have had no problem tracing back their family history dating back generations, 19th century and earlier!... At the height of the British Empire, Queen Victoria times, many of these people's ancestors were still ravaged by poverty, lived in tenements, slept 10 to a room, shared family shoes, children only able to step outdoors barefooted when the warmer climes came.. Yet their ancestors, voluntarily enlisted in the Great War and then thereafter were forcibly conscripted as the body count rose and the queues to voluntarily enlist shortened. Their ancestors also fought in the Second World War, many did not return and survivors were maimed both physically and mentally for life.. I recall being told of one cheery old boy who lived at the end of my road who were always a stop and chat type and who would never complain about anything.. I learnt from another neighbour, how in one night he'd lost numerous numbers of family and extended family members due to the aerial bombing. Many of those East End people have similar stories of those lost and not returning..Local libraries and town halls in the East End have plaques with large lists honouring the fallen, perhaps the longest lists of anywhere around the country. These people were mostly good people and yes sure, some not so good, but in the main they were good people who had seen tough times. These people were loyal to their country and they did not want much in return but a job, an apprenticeship for their teenage children, and for their communities to stay in tact with affordable housing so that they could see their children's children living locally...That's all gone now and their areas are now of Middle East appearance, with a sprinkling of gentefried professional hipster. Those old people are largely gone now but of those that remain, have feelings of betrayal, their communities gone. They see it as their country is no longer their country and that they were never asked.
The problem as I see it, is that the Leftists seem to only view it from the viewpoint of the migrants and see any unease of the natives as nothing but inherently evil.
I'm now warning of the dire consequences of the swift demographic changes. There is little assimilation with mass swift change, there is only balkanisation and resentment. IMO this has lead to a less European centric traditional and fair society, leading to authoritarian larger government, something our leaders are quite happy to oversee.
Finally in reply to your; "what the fudge is the 'white race' anyway"?
Your disdain for whites who do not share your leftist world view is evident....You come across as someone who's uncomfortable with whites being the majority in countries that they can call their own. Perhaps, like another poster who regularly posts on this forum, you want whites wiped out?