• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Bournemouth ***

By the way, what a MASSIVE decision from Mike Dean.

Big Sanchez got pushed lightly in the back, we concede but it is disallowed. To be fair Trippier and someone else in the box put their arm up immediately, but it was a VERY missable foul, great refereeing (for us)
 
Bullet said:
By the way, what a MASSIVE decision from Mike Dean.

Big Sanchez got pushed lightly in the back, we concede but it is disallowed. To be fair Trippier and someone else in the box put their arm up immediately, but it was a VERY missable foul, great refereeing (for us)
Click to expand...

Missable and gentle but one that you should always get

Can I just put it out there... we have won every game that aurier has foul thrown in!!! That’s an omen
 
elltrev said:
Funny how no one holds keepers to account for lunging for the ball, missing it, and taking out the player and injuring him.

If that was a defender that’s a nailed on foul.
Click to expand...

Absolutely right.

An outfield player and that’s a booking, at least. Missed the ball, scissors challenge, clearly dangerous play.
 
galeforce said:
yeah, but you don't get a pen if you are flagged offside before being fouled

if Begovic had punched Kane he'd have been carded, it was a typical keeper spread and a coming together, I didn't see any malice in it and would be furious if our keeper was booked for doing the same
Click to expand...

Oh, sure - that’s what I mean. No goal / pen because the offside was right.

But the keeper could / should still be sanctioned for the foul. And sure; no malice intended, but there doesn’t have to be.

I know they’re rarely given and I do understand why, but it’s a strange quirk in the interpretation of the law that skews toward keepers.

It’s a little incongruous in an era of less and less physical contact.
 
Hotshot-Tottenham said:
Oh, sure - that’s what I mean. No goal / pen because the offside was right.

But the keeper could / should still be sanctioned for the foul. And sure; no malice intended, but there doesn’t have to be.

I know they’re rarely given and I do understand why, but it’s a strange quirk in the interpretation of the law that skews toward keepers.

It’s a little incongruous in an era of less and less physical contact.
Click to expand...

It’s the same both ways, forwards are rarely booked for catching the keeper.

I agree it’s inconsistent, the attitude of “he has to go for it” pervades.
 
Hootnow said:
No mate, with all due respect, beating a midtable club to go up to 3rd is not a big game. By any stretch of the imagination.

We did show good bottle though to come back after going down and Kane coming off.

Great result considering everything, happy with the team today. Must have been very difficult to motivate themselves after the mid week game.
Click to expand...

Like the art of British comedy "it's all about the timing!"
The timing of this particular win was immeasurable!
 
Last edited:
Excellent win today.
Front line were very good once we had to rejig.
If it wasn't for sonny scoring the 2nd I'd have had dele as MOTM.
Wanyama and Rose looked a bit rusty still.
And get well soon Harry.
 
Hotshot-Tottenham said:
Oh, sure - that’s what I mean. No goal / pen because the offside was right.

But the keeper could / should still be sanctioned for the foul. And sure; no malice intended, but there doesn’t have to be.

I know they’re rarely given and I do understand why, but it’s a strange quirk in the interpretation of the law that skews toward keepers.

It’s a little incongruous in an era of less and less physical contact.
Click to expand...
I know what you're saying, but bear in mind that Begovic lunged at Kane with his testicles, and fiercely placed one testicle either side of his ankle.
Also bear in mind that Kane actually planted his foot himself at a twisted angle, a fraction of a second before Begovic landed on it... Kane would have been fine if he had planted his studs down but he put all his weight onto the side of his foot and then Begovic's testicles landed on his ankle. Also, Begovic's penis and perineum and anus. And let me tell you, Begovic has a very heavy midsection, once that lands on you, you really struggle to get air into your lungs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back