• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Search results

  1. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    He clearly doesn't fancy Richi. Levy Out
  2. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    Super defense. Porro, Sarr and someone else gave Paqueta no sight of goal. Active not passive
  3. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    Full house - surprising; thought most of their lot would be in Whitehall
  4. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    Hermansen, Areola, Fabianski? Pretty sure that's one keeper
  5. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    If Summerville doesn't spend most of the game in his own half we should be embarrassed. That defence is there for the taking. And the keeper is up there with one of worst in PL history.
  6. monkeybarry

    ***Spurs vs West Ham Untd***, PL, 13th September 2025 at The London Stadium

    Half decent Championship team that
  7. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    Fully agree.And as I highlighted in a previous post, there is a mechanism akin to a Judicial Review available to PA to reconsider the proscription. They should avail themselves of it - prove they don't meet the benchmark and that the political decision was incorrect....if it was. I don't...
  8. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    It's disingenuous to use hindsight in such a way, and exactly why we have laws. Laws are just philosophy and evolve over time. Re; your Rosa Parks comparison - see my post including the ANC, IRA, Suffragettes etc. I cover that principle in detail, and the principle of using hindsight in a...
  9. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I agree with those concerns, but I don't think that's what at play here (that said, I believed Blair re; WMDs. I was a teen then. Would I know? Not sure) PA have displayed they'll go to extremes - attacking a military base is a pretty extreme act. There don't seem to have been unnecessary...
  10. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    Elaborate upon how this is to with my morals (and I suggest you make it good).....
  11. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I'm genuinely really disappointed with this from you - this is beneath you. It's very clear that I haven't missed the point - but you know what, enlighten me if you think I have...... (Re the law. No, I'm not "hiding behind it" (and don't be so fudging condescending) - I'm adhering to it...
  12. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I think Mr Putin and his cathedral city loving (Salisbury, not cheese) friends might disagree. Proscribing PA is the political equivalent of tutting and not offering them tea; war with anyone that doesn't have US backing is not something we have the political balls to do. That said, I do take...
  13. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    That's not how law works. Are you conflating the actions of Israel against Palestine with the proscription of PA? Because this conversation isn't about how abhorrent Israel is being.
  14. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    Which by extension is a national security threat. The world has changed the past decade - we can't, as much as we'd love to, treat these things lightly anymore; I think a lot of poster in the last page or so need to realise and come to terms with that truth. It's an uncomfortable truth, but it...
  15. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I think you've completely missed my point. Protesting PA's cause - hell yes, go for it. Supporting a terrorist organisation (which PA are, like it or not) - no. A choice has been made between standing up for Palestine and supporting PA - and that's where the idiocy lies. And, ridiculously...
  16. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    We have a judicial system to examine that. I'm not comfortable with them being designated, however they did attack a military base. It's the "information not in the public domain" part that sways me - I see everyday in my job decisions that get made by legal professionals on information that...
  17. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    Then the same would apply. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, as is the "one man's terrorist Vs one man's freedom fighter" quote - but we have to deal with the now. There is no doubt, Nelson Mandela was a terrorist; philosophy determines whether that's good or bad. Similarly with the...
  18. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    They are a terrorist organisation as per the laws/policies of the country. I happen to agree with the last para. based upon what is in the public domain; however, it has been mentioned that there are non public informations that point to something more dangerous. But that's why I specifically...
  19. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    Cognitively Unimpressive National Triumphalist Spokespeople, the lot of them
Back