• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Andre Villas-Boas - Head Coach

and so it begins...


#AVB was told today, he effectively has 3 games to save his job. However from what I understand, defeat to WUFC will not be tolerated, and any repeat of the WAFC performance will end in the termination of his contract, I also understand these talks were not planned prior to the Arsenal game on Saturday. Daniel and the board have obvious concerns and will act accordingly #THFC #ITK

100% gonad*s. Fact.
 
Point 2 - surely until Moyes is offered a higher pressured job where he has more money to spend, we simply don't know if he operates better with a limited budget or not? Who'd have thought that Di Matteo would be capable of winning the Champion's League with Chelsea, or that Redknapp would get us top four in two of his three full seasons? Until someone is given a chance with a bigger club I think it's tough to judge how they'd do with more pressure and a bigger budget.

I see the logic behind your Moyes argument. I wonder who's going to bite for him? Di Matteo at Chelsea is one of the luckiest situations you could ever hope for. He is a talented manager for sure, but he is absolutely not a great one, not at all.
 
He took charge in late September, iirc - hardly half a season

As I said, he won the double in his first full season. Qualified for the CL in his first season. Hardly clogging it for seasons. And that was from chopping and changing... Bruce Rioch, had a season and a bit, took them over having finished 12th and got them back into Europe and was replaced by Wenger. He'd actually done a decent job, by any measure. Not saying it is right in our current instance but I don't believe in stability for the sake of stability. There needs to be clearly defined goals over specific timescales and I'd be inclined to talk almost on a season by season basis. If not, you'll be eaten by an exceptional Wenger type who doesn't need months and months to figure out where things are going wrong. Not X-Factor generation, just cold hard reality.
 
As I said, he won the double in his first full season. Qualified for the CL in his first season. Hardly clogging it for seasons. And that was from chopping and changing... Bruce Rioch, had a season and a bit, took them over having finished 12th and got them back into Europe and was replaced by Wenger. He'd actually done a decent job, by any measure. Not saying it is right in our current instance but I don't believe in stability for the sake of stability. There needs to be clearly defined goals over specific timescales and I'd be inclined to talk almost on a season by season basis. If not, you'll be eaten by an exceptional Wenger type who doesn't need months and months to figure out where things are going wrong. Not X-Factor generation, just cold hard reality.

the same Wenger that has seen his side decline year in year out for the last seven seasons ?
 
As I said, he won the double in his first full season. Qualified for the CL in his first season. Hardly clogging it for seasons. And that was from chopping and changing... Bruce Rioch, had a season and a bit, took them over having finished 12th and got them back into Europe and was replaced by Wenger. He'd actually done a decent job, by any measure. Not saying it is right in our current instance but I don't believe in stability for the sake of stability. There needs to be clearly defined goals over specific timescales and I'd be inclined to talk almost on a season by season basis. If not, you'll be eaten by an exceptional Wenger type who doesn't need months and months to figure out where things are going wrong. Not X-Factor generation, just cold hard reality.

Wenger hasn't won a thing in 7 years - did they sack him?

Sorry but what are you actually suggesting here? Getting rid of AVB at the end of the season if we haven't made 4th? He's here to implement a long term project and hopefully transfrom this club from grass-roots level up in terms of playing style and ethos. Cold hard reality? No, just sensible, patient approach to what shuoldn't be a fudging monopoly game

What about SAF's record - he struggled for years before winning a cup,

Again - taking over on the 30th of September is hardlly half a season - any which way you look at it.
 
Wenger hasn't won a thing in 7 years - did they sack him?

Sorry but what are you actually suggesting here? Getting rid of AVB at the end of the season if we haven't made 4th? He's here to implement a long term project and hopefully transfrom this club from grass-roots level up in terms of playing style and ethos. Cold hard reality? No, just sensible, patient approach to what shuoldn't be a fudging monopoly game

What about SAF's record - he struggled for years before winning a cup,

Again - taking over on the 30th of September is hardlly half a season - any which way you look at it.

I don't think that he would have been given the first team coach job title if he had a brief to do that
 
I don't think that he would have been given the first team coach job title if he had a brief to do that

Not sure what that means but the closest comparison is possibly Guardiola who has instilled a certain ethos at La Masia which every graduate follows from an early age
 
Can I say that Moyes would have been an even worse choice than AVB. My reasons are as follows:

1 - If people are moaning about not playing 2 strikers in a 4-4-2, do you think you'll be happy with Moyes??
2 - His methods seem to be great at developing defenders, especially CBs imo, and defensive midfielder types, but he seems to grind down creative players and forwards: watch Jelevic go into decline later in the seaosn and become a regular crock; If Fellaini stays another year, perhaps the same will happen to him too. I wonder also how long Mirallas will last (remember Van Der Meyder and Simon Davies??)
3 - I think the shoe-string budget is often overplayed in respect to Moyes; he has art times had money to spend but the retun on his investment over the years is not very good imo. In fact, Harry gets his teams playing much better on less spend.
4 - If we feel bored with AVB's method, we'd feel even more bored with Moyes.

I'm glad we didn't appoint Moyes after sacking Harry; there would have been no point

Moyes is a good solid manager but for the ambitions we
 
So we're discussing how long AVB has left based upon what some kid posted on twitter.

Shockingly this kid is not ITK.
I've no idea why people retweet/repost information everywhere without checking if the originator had any credibility.
 
Wenger hasn't won a thing in 7 years - did they sack him?

They should have done. It looks exactly like stability for the sake of it, based on goodwill. Chopping and changing until you get someone exceptional is as good a tactic as any these days. Didn't work out too bad for Chelsea last season, even if RDM isn't actually all that exceptional (which I don't think he is and I wouldn't be surprised to see him gone before the end of the season). Sometimes it means some short term pain, for sure. It happened when we chopped and changed Jol.

Sorry but what are you actually suggesting here? Getting rid of AVB at the end of the season if we haven't made 4th? He's here to implement a long term project and hopefully transfrom this club from grass-roots level up in terms of playing style and ethos. Cold hard reality? No, just sensible, patient approach to what shuoldn't be a fudging monopoly game

Not at all. I've come around to agreeing with some of the bleaker assessments of our squad but we still need minimum standard of performance and I think most of the recent evidence shows that if you have a mediocre year then you tend not to turn it around. It is a clear indicator that you're not up to it (for now anyway). Those who hit the ground running are the ones who tend to end in the jobs long term. That is why pointing at Wenger as an example of why you should just stick with your man is all muddled. Wenger, initially anyway, lasted so long because of his exceptional talent. Not because he and Arsenal had a long term plan that they stuck to. As if this is some sort of miracle answer on its own. All the patient long term planning in the world won't work if the guy just doesn't have the talent. So what would be a mediocre season? I think I outlined one in previous posts: anything below 7th. This is based on our lowest position over the last few years, having started the season by picking up 2 points in 8 games, with a hopelessly unbalanced squad for 2/3rds of the season. We still finished 8th. So 7th seems like a realistic minimum. If he can't manage that then I don't think he's got the ability. I still expect him to do it, comfortably.

I think this is very kind in comparison to the way the board would be judging it. On recent managerial changes at Spurs, I'd say you get about 2 months bad results tops before you're out the door. Long term plans? Heard it all before. Hoddle had a 5 year plan. Arnesen who in turn brought in Jol was part of a long term plan. Then Comolli and Ramos who followed them. Funny enough, the only one who didn't, who seemed to be the desperate and apparently short term solution was the man who tore it up.

What about SAF's record - he struggled for years before winning a cup

Different era. No Champions League. No Bosman or player power (to the same extent). Your best players stuck around for longer. If you need 4 years to sort things out now then you simply won't be in the job.

Again - taking over on the 30th of September is hardlly half a season - any which way you look at it.

What I said was accurate. He won the double in his first full season. Taking over 30th September = still not a full season. Even if you want to call that a full season - he qualified for the Champions League in it. How is that 'clogging it'? And you said 'clogging it for years'. Which implies more than one. He won the double in his second season. There wasn't much clogging it for years with Wenger. He came in and was exceptional from the start. There is no way any Arsenal fans would have been saying 'we need to give him time'
 
Last edited:
Not sure what that means but the closest comparison is possibly Guardiola who has instilled a certain ethos at La Masia which every graduate follows from an early age

AVB has a different job title to his immediate predecessor, that must have been done for a reason. Did Guardiola have a different job title to Rijkaard?

I think that it is most likely that someone else will be brought in to oversee the football side of things throughout the club and that AVB will concentrate on the first team.
 
I think most of the recent evidence shows that if you have a mediocre year then you tend not to turn it around. It is a clear indicator that you're not up to it (for now anyway). Those who hit the ground running are the ones who tend to end in the jobs long term.

That couldn't be further from the truth and I pray tell Levy sticks to his word this time and sees this out medim-to-long terms.

There are countless examples of slow starters who have been highly successful

Different era. No Champions League. No Bosman or player power (to the same extent). Your best players stuck around for longer. If you need 4 years to sort things out now then you simply won't be the job

What on earth does Bosman have to do with his success - that is strawman, at best.

And yes - there WAS Champions League - simply without the catchy tune.

Point remains - he struggled for years to turn it around.

You're suggesting chooping and changing if we don't win the title this year - well, we've been doing it for more than a decade under ENIC and what have we achieved? One League Cup?
 
AVB has a different job title to his immediate predecessor, that must have been done for a reason. Did Guardiola have a different job title to Rijkaard?

I think that it is most likely that someone else will be brought in to oversee the football side of things throughout the club and that AVB will concentrate on the first team.

His job-title is irrelevant - what matters is the ethos he introduces to the club and implements on all levels. He can set it out in a report to the youth coach for all it's worth but the underlying principles and overall approach are informed by him (or should ideally be) - as it has been the case in most successful clubs in recent history
 
I've always felt RAWK's rules are pretty well set out when it comes to this sort of info - no source = no flimflam, please

Source is this attention seeker
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/270617451065118720
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/270617487610101760
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/270617500272697345

Looking at his history
on deadline day he posted a lot of bs about Llorente
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/241547893692059648

And then still reckoned we were signing Moutinho 10 minutes after deadline when everyone else has given up
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/241674154737274882

And earlier in the day
https://twitter.com/theSPURSinsider/status/241557537160314881

People should do a bit of research before reposting crap.
 
Back