• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Former Chairman

Wouldn’t be looking to play NBA at Tottenham though would they. Would have to be indoors, the O2 or something like that.
It is the O2 apparently, but then again I suspect (and I think business wise its a good idea, not for sports fans) but you basically play games in all major European cities on occasion. City will pay for the privilege which will cover a host of costs, loads of then commercial revenue to make
 
Why would they stop the move? Under what concerns?

I suppose if you own a company that defaulted on loads of payments it might not have you covered in fit and proper (if taking over the whole club). I say that vaguely as I have zero idea on the criteria for fit and proper seeing as we allowed a murderous Russian in
 
Why would they stop the move? Under what concerns?
If the Google AI search is correct, then Triller the parent company of Eight Sports may be considered as not suitable owners by the Regulator but it's all guesswork.

Corporate analysts have highlighted acute funding risks associated with the firm. Its parent company, Triller, was officially delisted from the Nasdaq stock market following repeated failures to file mandatory financial reports and ongoing doubts regarding its status as a "going concern"
 
I suppose if you own a company that defaulted on loads of payments it might not have you covered in fit and proper (if taking over the whole club). I say that vaguely as I have zero idea on the criteria for fit and proper seeing as we allowed a murderous Russian in
But that was the Premier League that allowed the Russian to become an owner not the Regulator who wasn't in existence at the time , regulator only started last year.

 
But that was the Premier League that allowed the Russian to become an owner not the Regulator who wasn't in existence at the time , regulator only started last year.


Fair enough, either or though right? Both should have interests of clubs and longevity at heart.........he says
 
I haven't caught up on all the happenings since yesterday but I did see this the other day (not sure if already posted), which might explain why Levy is selling up :

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Story, such that it is (not a lot of substance) here
Lol well he can build them a new stadium with a movable floor to host 5 a side futsal
 
so to summarize ... levy had 30% in enic. sold 24.9% to Eight Sports Capital.
24.9% is below UK significant shareholder so levy could sell without any interference from Lewise family trust or the regulator.
levy will use the money to buy an NBA franchise to bring to the UK.
While without majority shareholding, levy can still potentially gang up with Eight Sports to challenge Lewis family trusts on certain matters.
 
so to summarize ... levy had 30% in enic. sold 24.9% to Eight Sports Capital.
24.9% is below UK significant shareholder so levy could sell without any interference from Lewise family trust or the regulator.
levy will use the money to buy an NBA franchise to bring to the UK.
While without majority shareholding, levy can still potentially gang up with Eight Sports to challenge Lewis family trusts on certain matters.
To put a spanner in the works , ENIC SPORTS AND DEVELOPMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED are not subject to UK financial rules , it's down to whatever the rules are in The Bahamas or depends on where ENIC are registered, there are various ENIC companies but the ultimate owners of THFC are the ones above and they are not registered in the UK.
 
To put a spanner in the works , ENIC SPORTS AND DEVELOPMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED are not subject to UK financial rules , it's down to whatever the rules are in The Bahamas or depends on where ENIC are registered, there are various ENIC companies but the ultimate owners of THFC are the ones above and they are not registered in the UK.

Not as simple as that

- You have company house rules, UK football rules and UBO (ultimate owner) rules

The fact that the sales was exactly 24.9% is showing the model is subject to UK rules, it's to avoid certain triggers, beyond the threshold, 25% could have triggered ownership review from PL, and ENIC will have to at some point update UBOs for UK.
 
Wouldn’t be looking to play NBA at Tottenham though would they. Would have to be indoors, the O2 or something like that.
The underground car park at WHL? You'd be able to get some retractable seating in there

Seriously though, we should definitely be looking to build a Co-op Arena type venue on the Worcester Road school field site
 
Not as simple as that

- You have company house rules, UK football rules and UBO (ultimate owner) rules

The fact that the sales was exactly 24.9% is showing the model is subject to UK rules, it's to avoid certain triggers, beyond the threshold, 25% could have triggered ownership review from PL, and ENIC will have to at some point update UBOs for UK.
If Google correct it looks like it's the same 25% in The Bahamas as the UK, about time we had an official statement from someone.

Beneficial Ownership Secure Search (BOSS) System: Under the Register of Beneficial Ownership Act, all Bahamian companies must report their true beneficial owners. A beneficial owner is defined as any natural person holding 25% or more of the company’s shares or voting rights.
 
Well, exactly. I was asking why only 24.9% and not the 25% that would force a mandatory offer?

Anyway, it seems the threshold is 30% for Bahamas registered companies (at least according to Google's AI) so that doesn't seem the reason.
Remember that ENIC only owns approx 86% of THFC shares, so even if someone buys 25% of ENIC’s shares, that only gives them about 21-22% of THFC.

However, there are various control issues such as the voting rights of those shares, board seats etc. which could have further impact on the ownership structure. Not all shares are created equal.
 
Back