• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Harry Redknapp: The Aftermath

Would you keep Arry after the Season?

  • Yes - He's done well and should be given at least one more season to consolidate our team

    Votes: 25 53.2%
  • No - he's peaked and would hold us back.

    Votes: 22 46.8%

  • Total voters
    47
Oh my GHod

Ok I am going to say this once and once only because it seems that some people on here are utterly fudgein clueless.

By bringing on Parker you allowed Modric, Lennon AND BALE further upfield to support Ade. You also allowed one of Kaboul and Gallas more upfield. Not to mention walker.

So HE DID NOT SETTLE FOR A fudgeIN DRAW. He changed a formation to be more attacking WITH ONLY TEN MEN

Or we could allow Modric, Lennon, Bale AND Defoe further up field? A draw is the same as a loss, if we had gone for it and conceded it would have made no difference whatsoever
 
Oh my GHod

Ok I am going to say this once and once only because it seems that some people on here are utterly fudgein clueless.

By bringing on Parker you allowed Modric, Lennon AND BALE further upfield to support Ade. You also allowed one of Kaboul and Gallas more upfield. Not to mention walker.

So HE DID NOT SETTLE FOR A fudgeIN DRAW. He changed a formation to be more attacking WITH ONLY TEN MEN

Bringing on a striker would have been a better option
 
Bale did not have his shooting boots on today all his shots were wrong one of those days for him. Modric and lennon are not pure goal scoreres, we needed a goal.

There are no guarantees but methinks if you need a goal and you only have 1 striker on the pitch how about you bring on another one?
 
but if we'd lost we'd have needed a 3 goal win against fulham next week should arsenal draw rather than a just any old win now. 2nd away game in 4 days with the same players and 40 minutes with 10 men. it's not easy to say the least. arsenal have looked really shaky recently. a 50/50 at best they win
 
bringing on Defoe (which I wanted by the way) will have still meant a couple of players would have had to stay back so less attacking options.

I agree that we should have got Defoe on but what im incensed about is the whole "Harry settled for a draw" OFCOURSE HE fudgeIN DIDNT. Because if he did he would have brought on Parker ALOT earlier.
 
Where did our pressing game go? Ever since new year we seem to be unable to do it, or has someone told the players to stay back more? If we would have pressed Villa more intensely this game we’d have had the three points.
 
We are a fudging laughing stock! Seriosuly when ever a big game comes up for us people must chuckle to themselves at the thought of us doing something. I should have learnt by now and be making some serious money on us bricking our pants in big games. Watch us draw with fulham, maybe we will have 30 corners in that game!
 
I know some people try to put a positive spin on everything but this has to go down as yet another wasted opportunity. A massive, massive opportunity wasted. The game was there for the taking but I can only assume that Harry believes going into the last game a point behind Saudi Sportswashing Machine is more important than challenging Arsenal for 3rd.

Securing CL and keeping the likes of Modric and Bale now relies on WBA and Bayern and frankly I dont have much confidence in any of them to helping us out.
 
There are no guarantees but methinks if you need a goal and you only have 1 striker on the pitch how about you bring on another one?

I know so obvous it is painful it is like he is trying to make himself be a master tactican by doing the opposite of what he should do, that or he is an awful coach or he has just given up on football.

Wish he would fudge off to dubai
 
bringing on Defoe (which I wanted by the way) will have still meant a couple of players would have had to stay back so less attacking options.

I agree that we should have got Defoe on but what im incensed about is the whole "Harry settled for a draw" OFCOURSE HE fudgeIN DIDNT. Because if he did he would have brought on Parker ALOT earlier.

The players who would have had to stay back would have been Sandro, Gallas and Kaboul with Walker tracking back when needed. Hardly a huge loss when we could have gained a lot more with Defoe

Hell, what actually happened was Gallas went up front by the end of the game, Defoe would have been much better in that position I think we can agree
 
macaronic doesn't even begin to describe some people. Bringing on a striker doesn't mean an automatic goal ffs. How many times have we brought on Defoe and switched to a 4-4-2 when things were not going to plan, only to look and play even more brick and not even create any decent chance? it's happened so often this season but people still don't want to register it in their thick heads and continue this flimflam.

He put on Parker so we can get hold of the ball more, to keep possesion, and to hopefully create chances from it. "Put on Defoe, put on Defoe" oh shut up with that flimflam.
 
The thing about finishing 4th is that while most of us think Bayern are a better team than Chelsea we all know that on any given day when the likes of Drogba, Lampard and co turn up they can get a battling result.
 
but if we'd lost we'd have needed a 3 goal win against fulham next week should arsenal draw rather than a just any old win now. 2nd away game in 4 days with the same players and 40 minutes with 10 men. it's not easy to say the least. arsenal have looked really shaky recently. a 50/50 at best they win


This man has sense.


"A draw is the same as a loss" hahahahahha some people man dear GHod.
 
macaronic doesn't even begin to describe some people. Bringing on a striker doesn't mean an automatic goal ffs. How many times have we brought on Defoe and switched to a 4-4-2 when things were not going to plan, only to look and play even more brick and not even create any decent chance? it's happened so often this season but people still don't want to register it in their thick heads and continue this flimflam.

He put on Parker so we can get hold of the ball more, to keep possesion, and to hopefully create chances from it. "Put on Defoe, put on Defoe" oh shut up with that flimflam.

We didn't have any trouble holding on to the ball at all throughout the second half, we dominated possession up until the final whistle. What we needed was someone who can create themselves a chance, or at the very least take up another defender and give Adebayor a chance to get in to some space
 
macaronic doesn't even begin to describe some people. Bringing on a striker doesn't mean an automatic goal ffs. How many times have we brought on Defoe and switched to a 4-4-2 when things were not going to plan, only to look and play even more brick and not even create any decent chance? it's happened so often this season but people still don't want to register it in their thick heads and continue this flimflam.

He put on Parker so we can get hold of the ball more, to keep possesion, and to hopefully create chances from it. "Put on Defoe, put on Defoe" oh shut up with that flimflam.
PArker can only keep the ball with himself. He had the ball on a few occassions and started to do his one armed canoeist impression again only for us to lose possession.
 
Oh my GHod

Ok I am going to say this once and once only because it seems that some people on here are utterly fudgein clueless.

By bringing on Parker you allowed Modric, Lennon AND BALE further upfield to support Ade. You also allowed one of Kaboul and Gallas more upfield. Not to mention walker.

So HE DID NOT SETTLE FOR A fudgeIN DRAW. He changed a formation to be more attacking WITH ONLY TEN MEN

Or he could have put on Defoe and had him playing more upfield? You know 1 of our top scorers?
 
By bringing on Parker you allowed Modric, Lennon AND BALE further upfield to support Ade. You also allowed one of Kaboul and Gallas more upfield. Not to mention walker.
agree with this.

Its easy in hindsight to say it didnt work. Bale is capable of winning us the game.

personally I feel Villa were so negative that it wouldnt have mattered. Just chuck Defoe on and tell Bale to push on.
 
Back