• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Recent content by Benny_Lad

  1. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    That is true to a degree. But we sat in against City and won 4-0. We had players capable of getting us out. Solanke and Deki to hold the ball. Madders to pass. Son and Johnson with pace. They still played deep but were dangerous on the break. (Relates to my above post). On the flip side, the...
  2. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    I think the point for me is, you can do that with Kane, Son and Bale as a front 3 (I’m being extreme). You can’t do it with Odobert, Richy and Kudus. So therefore it was an ok idea but without the tools to execute - hence fail. So Frank has to find the right balance between strategy and tools...
  3. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    Exactly. If Kudus and Xavi produce Son and Maddison (or dare I say Johnson and Maddison) numbers I’ll eat my shoe. I believe there is better to come from Kudus when he has quality around him and attacking intent in the system. He’s a danger to no one picking the ball up 70 yards from goal...
  4. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    We spent £100m on those 3 attackers. That is chicken feed. You get what you pay for.
  5. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    I will caveat this by saying our front players looked a lot better when on the front foot against Utd. Doing that horrible job in a defensive setup where it’s punted up to you and you have to make it stick and build is a thankless task. We were lucky it worked through Kane and Son when we...
  6. B

    Thomas Frank - Head Coach

    What about D: The players aren’t good enough. In the summer with Son regressing and going, we should have been looking to improve him, Maddison and Solanke. (I still rate Maddison). Instead we are now desperate for the latter 2 to return. Nobody can look at yesterday’s lineup and think Richy...
  7. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    Maybe. Sunderland found a way against them last game. And they had 3 big players missing today. So why can’t we?
  8. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    This is as bad as I’ve seen it. We were better than these 3 seasons ago. They’ve marched on and spent big and we’ve penny pinched wherever possible. Of course we’re going to be miles behind.
  9. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    The pro Frank’s should be having a whinge today.
  10. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    Post Kane and Son the club really had to push the button and spend more than usual. We signed 3 attacking players. One was planned and has scored 1 goal. The other two were a panic buy and a desperate loan - neither has scored a goal. The club should have had our targets and transfer strategy...
  11. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    Which system (with these players?)
  12. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    We are the 4th highest scorers in the league. So which attacking system would give us more goals? Imo there isn’t one with the players we have available.
  13. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    I rewatched it and it’s tight. But I also saw Oliver give 4 out of 4 decisions to Saka where he was barely breathed on for 3 of them so I’m not surprised it went Arsenal’s way.
  14. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    I don’t think they were in line. I wanted them to be but I don’t think they were.
  15. B

    ***OFFICIAL***SPURS***L'arse***OMT***

    Might aswell have a go now. Danso, Odo, Richy off. Simons, RKM, Tel on. Then Bergval and Johnson later.
See more
Back