• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

Rorschach said:
Debunked by a dark money funded think tank affiliate would not be something I would take as wrote. I don't know how accurate the 100bil figure is but it lines up the obr and bank of england estimates.
Click to expand...

I've seen various articles over the years explaining why they think the figures are incorrect, I'll share when I next come across some. But regardless of the think tank doesn't mean the figures used aren't correct, as you can see all sources are named.

UK growth is actually ahead of the larger EU countries. Part of that growth is down to technology investment some of which would move away were we to rejoin.
 
P.D. said:
I've seen various articles over the years explaining why they think the figures are incorrect, I'll share when I next come across some. But regardless of the think tank doesn't mean the figures used aren't correct, as you can see all sources are named.

UK growth is actually ahead of the larger EU countries. Part of that growth is down to technology investment some of which would move away were we to rejoin.
Click to expand...
This particular think tank gave the UK trussonomics, and I know ad hominem attacks on it are a pretty lazy argument; still I wouldn't put much credence in what they say. The OBR and Bank of England, however they measure the GDP drag, would be considered more trusted sources I would assume. In saying that, I think GDP is a tinkle poor measurement, and certainly not fit for the purpose of measuring the well-being of a country. That is really what drives opinion more than some economic headline figure, IMO.
 
Itv got an undercover reporter into Reform HQ for a few months, doc dropping on Sunday night apparently.

The Reform boys not happy

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Mikey10 said:
Moving things away from London is no bad thing - and, indeed, is part of Burnham's stated policy intentions.
Click to expand...

Not sure the claims of costs rising because of extra safety is an excuse to be giving either. It might be true, but to moan about it...........given grenfell.........bad form
 
MadSpurs said:
Itv got an undercover reporter into Reform HQ for a few months, doc dropping on Sunday night apparently.

The Reform boys not happy

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Going to be interesting what they uncover
 
Rorschach said:
This particular think tank gave the UK trussonomics, and I know ad hominem attacks on it are a pretty lazy argument; still I wouldn't put much credence in what they say. The OBR and Bank of England, however they measure the GDP drag, would be considered more trusted sources I would assume. In saying that, I think GDP is a tinkle poor measurement, and certainly not fit for the purpose of measuring the well-being of a country. That is really what drives opinion more than some economic headline figure, IMO.
Click to expand...

It's a terrible measure, I'm surprised no one has come up or even suggested measuring different things.
 
Mikey10 said:
Moving things away from London is no bad thing - and, indeed, is part of Burnham's stated policy intentions.
Click to expand...

They're moving away because they dont think its viable, not because of policies to actively improve social mobility. We do need to balance out different areas but London still needs plenty of new housing.
 
P.D. said:
It's a terrible measure, I'm surprised no one has come up or even suggested measuring different things.
Click to expand...
Yes terrible. I have seen plenty of very good suggestions over the years, but none have been widely adopted. Kate Raworth's 'donut' is one that comes to mind that had a bit of traction (good book too). I'm sure I was reading a while back about some countries that have gone a different way, maybe still publishing GDP but also using a selection of more relevant metrics. I'll search for that.
 
MadSpurs said:
Itv got an undercover reporter into Reform HQ for a few months, doc dropping on Sunday night apparently.

The Reform boys not happy

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...
'...probable criminal activity...'

'Probable' potentially doing a lot of heavy lifting there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back