• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Radu Drăgușin

robp135 said:
Depends on what the obligation is really.

Coming of the ACL and not playing his value is really low so this is probably best we could get.
Click to expand...
I fully expected we'd have to loan him out until his contract expired, mate. To get close to £15m for him is good business.

On the obligation, I think there's a difference between that and an option to buy - obligation means you will trigger it come what may, it's just shifted to the next year for accounts purposes. Option means you have the power to trigger it subject to certain criteria - it's rare those end up being triggered, for us anyway.

That's how I've always understood it, at least.
 
DubaiSpur said:
I fully expected we'd have to loan him out until his contract expired, mate. To get close to £15m for him is good business.

On the obligation, I think there's a difference between that and an option to buy - obligation means you will trigger it come what may, it's just shifted to the next year for accounts purposes. Option means you have the power to trigger it subject to certain criteria - it's rare those end up being triggered, for us anyway.

That's how I've always understood it, at least.
Click to expand...

Yeh just depends that the obligation is. Suggestion from Gold in that tweet is number of games. Let’s hope it’s realistic.

Didn’t Harvey Elliot have an obligation where Villa pay £40M if he played 10 games and Emery couldn’t play him cos they are poor brummies with no Beyoncé concerts.
 
This is a deal Levy would have never done by the way. He would want the transfer fee for him and then on August 30th take a loan with no obligation. We saw that with Solomon & Gil as examples.
 
DubaiSpur said:
Deal agreed with Fiorentina, loan with obligation to buy. 1.5m euros for the loan, 17.5m for obligation apparently. Di Marzio and Romano both confirming.

Good deal, and good luck to the lad - injuries ruined any chances he had with us, but I still feel there's a decent player there, just one with rotten luck and who suffered in the chaos that was Tottenham Hotspur these past two seasons.
Click to expand...
nah, he's just brick. from his first appearance at fulham to the end, cant think of a single solid game from him
 
The Cycle

1) Spurs sign a player for modest money and everyone gets excited that they're the next best thing since sliced bread
2) Said player spends a couple of underwhelming seasons in our own squad, and we realise we made a mistake buying them
3) We can't find buyer so we end up loaning them out for a season in the hope we can then shift them
4) We finally sell them 3 or 4 seasons after they first joined.
5) We then bring in some money and go back to 1

Now the big question becomes whether we will stop this nonsense under the new leadership group. It's been going on for years and years under Levy and ENIC.
 
Zavod 311 said:
nah, he's just brick. from his first appearance at fulham to the end, cant think of a single solid game from him
Click to expand...
He's not brick. It's just yet another example of our poor recruitment purchasing a centre back not suited to playing in a high line. He was very good in Italy and was getting rave reviews for the national team.

He will go back to Italy and be a success, just like Vicario will....
 
harr1984 said:
He's not brick. It's just yet another example of our poor recruitment purchasing a centre back not suited to playing in a high line. He was very good in Italy and was getting rave reviews for the national team.

He will go back to Italy and be a success, just like Vicario will....
Click to expand...

I blame the tactics not the recruitment
 
harr1984 said:
He's not brick. It's just yet another example of our poor recruitment purchasing a centre back not suited to playing in a high line. He was very good in Italy and was getting rave reviews for the national team.

He will go back to Italy and be a success, just like Vicario will....
Click to expand...
forget high line - he cant defend a cross, pass, inept awareness, slow, poor decision making.

as u say, im sure he'll be successful in that slow, garbage league
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back