• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Eberechi Eze

Finney Is Back said:
I don't see Kulu doing much good work starting inside. I see most of his good work being done cutting inside from the right. I can see Kulu playing as a support striker in a 4-4-2 type formation or even a 4-1-3-1 type formation where the central player has is free to roam across the pitch in the attacking areas and has no defensive responsibility but not really somebody that can play as one of the midfield 3 in a 4-3-3.

As I've repeatedly said I would've signed Enzo Millot as our Maddison cover/competition. He is ready now but also has a huge upside. A slightly leftfield suggestion for an alternative could be Pacqueta from West Ham, has lots of quality and has shown he has what it takes for the PL. McAtee from Emirates Marketing Project would be a good long term option. El Khannouss, who we've been linked with from Leicester, is also a decent option. None of those players would break the bank.

Hincapie would be a sensible signing right now in the fact that he can play left back in a 4 at the back system or left sided centre back in either a 3 or a 4 at the back system. Though I think we only sign another centre back if Romero leaves (which seems to be getting less and less likely).
Click to expand...
Some murmurs on X that we're trying to hijack the Millot to Atleti transfer
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
Bedfordspurs said:
Let’s see what happens
I don’t see them selling him for anything less than that fee regardless
I wonder now if the timing of Sonny’s departure aligns with us going for him
Click to expand...
We would have known for a while he was leaving

It would have made sense to get him in before it was announced.

I'm still of the view the idea of Eze is better than actually having him.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
I rate eze and thing he is a great player
Click to expand...

With Sonny leaving, it finally made sense to me why we've been pursuing an attacking midfielder of the Gibbs-White mould despite the squad having more gaps elsewhere.

If you assume we stay in the rough 4-2-3-1 shape Frank used against the Goons, then you need a winger on the left capable of cutting inside when Udogie bombs up, or staying wide if Porro bombs up on the other end and Udogie tucks inside. However, that isn't to say the left-winger is a 'touchline' winger like Ange used - it's more that he's a creative outlet from the left, and will have his moments to drive infield.

There are a surplus of attacking midfielders on the market atm who can do that - not so many 'pure' left wingers aside from ones that we won't pay for, like Mitoma, Leao et al.

Plus, a mature attacking midfielder out wide coming inside also makes sense from a squad management perspective, because you have to plan for a) Moore's future role - Moore does his best work on the left, and b) the fact that Tel seems to want to play as a striker long-term, despite being better our wide. So you have to have a player who can start on the left in the short-term, but then transition into a different role in the longer-term - and the most open spot is being the eventual replacement for Maddison, who will be 30 next year and was never the fittest.

All this, to me, indicates that Eze ticks every one of those boxes - and although he seems set on the Goons, we could perhaps offer him more than they could in terms of a nailed on starting-spot (off the left) and marquee wages (given he'd be replacing Son). It's better than being their equivalent of Trossard, anyway.

The barrier has always been that we won't pay for him - and unless that changes, it means the Goons get him eventually, because they're just a far better run and more ambitious club than we will ever be under ENIC. But the 'fit', squad-wise, is so perfect with us it hurts.
 
DubaiSpur said:
With Sonny leaving, it finally made sense to me why we've been pursuing an attacking midfielder of the Gibbs-White mould despite the squad having more gaps elsewhere.

If you assume we stay in the rough 4-2-3-1 shape Frank used against the Goons, then you need a winger on the left capable of cutting inside when Udogie bombs up, or staying wide if Porro bombs up on the other end and Udogie tucks inside. However, that isn't to say the left-winger is a 'touchline' winger like Ange used - it's more that he's a creative outlet from the left, and will have his moments to drive infield.

There are a surplus of attacking midfielders on the market atm who can do that - not so many 'pure' left wingers aside from ones that we won't pay for, like Mitoma, Leao et al.

Plus, a mature attacking midfielder out wide coming inside also makes sense from a squad management perspective, because you have to plan for a) Moore's future role - Moore does his best work on the left, and b) the fact that Tel seems to want to play as a striker long-term, despite being better our wide. So you have to have a player who can start on the left in the short-term, but then transition into a different role in the longer-term - and the most open spot is being the eventual replacement for Maddison, who will be 30 next year and was never the fittest.

All this, to me, indicates that Eze ticks every one of those boxes - and although he seems set on the Goons, we could perhaps offer him more than they could in terms of a nailed on starting-spot (off the left) and marquee wages (given he'd be replacing Son). It's better than being their equivalent of Trossard, anyway.

The barrier has always been that we won't pay for him - and unless that changes, it means the Goons get him eventually, because they're just a far better run and more ambitious club than we will ever be under ENIC. But the 'fit', squad-wise, is so perfect with us it hurts.
Click to expand...
I think we would pay for him if we wanted him
I also don’t think they (arse) will pay for him and will try to get him by haggling to the point that palace will tell them where to go (gut feel)
We will see next week when things will start moving IMO
 
I hope that we don’t get him. He’s not a bad player but he is not a one touch player or can pass immediately. He likes to hold the ball and assess. I think we would get incredibly frustrated with him if we are hitting teams on the break like Frank likes to do.
 
Gazza said:
I hope that we don’t get him. He’s not a bad player but he is not a one touch player or can pass immediately. He likes to hold the ball and assess. I think we would get incredibly frustrated with him if we are hitting teams on the break like Frank likes to do.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what Spam fans say about Kudus, yet we ended up going for him anyway. I don't think that's necessarily an impediment - think the team needs a few lads who can take control of the ball and make the right choice, as opposed to the quick one.

Plus, helps that he's a ridiculously good ball carrier, much like Kudus, so even if he doesn't release it immediately, he has the tools to keep us moving forward anyway.
 
DubaiSpur said:
That's exactly what Spam fans say about Kudus, yet we ended up going for him anyway. I don't think that's necessarily an impediment - think the team needs a few lads who can take control of the ball and make the right choice, as opposed to the quick one.

Plus, helps that he's a ridiculously good ball carrier, much like Kudus, so even if he doesn't release it immediately, he has the tools to keep us moving forward anyway.
Click to expand...
Kudus is also one with pace who can run on to blast from deeper positions.

Eze is not. But he’s not coming here anyway so I’m ok with that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back