monkeybarry
Dimitar Berbatov
Yeah, but what does he DO?He created 5 chances, got an assist, lost possession twice, and completed 88% of his passes, but you think he was woeful?
Yeah, but what does he DO?He created 5 chances, got an assist, lost possession twice, and completed 88% of his passes, but you think he was woeful?
When in the game did that "constantly" happen?
The fact that he didn't would suggest that Lamela got the balance between caution and aggression perfectly.
Well he didn't get sent off so he clearly didn't go too far.Perhaps he has some sort of weird, ju-ju, unpredictable-ref slide-rule. Could be, because I observe him judging those sort of arm-flailing, lunging challenges to perfection all the time. Not.
He had a quiet game attacking until the assist but it was a very inteligent pass, could have dribbled and shot but he had his head up and laid it across.
In the whole game his defensive work was brilliant, always up and down giving cover to his defensive colleagues and kept going.
You can see why he starts as he functions in the team rather than as an individual. If he can regulalrly pull of amazing individual performances ( ala Emirates Marketing Project) to couple with his team efforts then we really have something.
Which stats do you think would be better to assess his performance?
Well he didn't get sent off so he clearly didn't go too far.
Opinions are just opinions.... I don't think that mine have any more relevance than yours (although yours are clearly wrong!)Finney, who I have just seen gave Rose man of the match (by far the worst player on the pitch) now says Lamela was awful in the same match (probably the best player on the pitch). This is hilarious...I thought Modric was my opposite with opinions... Crazy crazy thinking!!!
2 goals and 3 assists in the league so far. Total of 5 direct goal involvements. Same as Kane (5 goals) and Eriksen (also 2 goals, 3 assists). Those 3 have been our most influential attacking players in terms of direct tangible results (goals and assists).
I don't think it's quite fair to expect Lamela to perform like against City regularly. But if he keeps working hard and delivering goals and assists at a good rate like this I would suggest we already have something. Especially as he's stopped giving the ball away as much as he did back when he was struggling and is functioning well in our buildup play too.
I think that until or unless he gets sent off in a match for us, the proximity between him and getting sent off can only be judged to be correct.You're begging the question of accurate and fair decisions on the part of the referee (hardly appropriate, in the circumstances). There was no fine line of judgment that Lamela gauged to perfection. He was lucky (as players sometimes are, sometimes aren't with refs) and he needs to learn to control himself better, especially when he's already been cautioned. That last is really the only point I'm making.
I think that until or unless he gets sent off in a match for us, the proximity between him and getting sent off can only be judged to be correct.
Not sure why anyone would single out Lamela's performance against Villa, not great, not terrible (much like how the team as a whole played, stuck in 2nd gear)
What I have noticed was not his eagerness and workrate (think he always had that), in the Villa game I saw his strength on the ball has improved significantly, he actually is shielding the ball against physical pressure (he would fall down previously). In my opinion if he adds strength on the ball, +taking the simple route more often (he did for Kane goal), then he will likely be a far more effective player for us.
Opinions are just opinions.... I don't think that mine have any more relevance than yours (although yours are clearly wrong!)![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.