Gordon Taylor has accused football sides of “a hidden racism which holds clubs back” when it comes to appointing black managers and called for the introduction of the “Rooney Rule” in use in American football to ensure that black candidates have an adequate representation on interview shortlists for coaching positions.
The chief executive of the Professional Footballers’ Association told the BBC that the appointment of black players as coaches “should be based on merit” and he said that they had “merit as players and merit as coaches”.
He added: “I can give you a list of black players who’ve become coaches, who’ve got their A licence, who’ve got their B licence, who’ve gone all the way up the ranks, they’ve got the pro-licence and aren’t getting opportunities. So I know for a fact they’ve got that merit but there is a hidden racism that seems to hold clubs back.”
Taylor praised Huddersfield for appointing Chris Powell after he was sacked by Charlton in March though he is now only one of two black managers employed by the 92 clubs in English football along with Keith Curle at Carlisle.
“Can we not have a recruitment process that is open and transparent and contains black, asian, minority or ethnic people who are qualified? said Taylor.
“They have the Rooney Rule in gridiron because they similarly had a high number of black players but no black coaches. The rule was introduced to say look, at least make sure you’ve interviewed some of these players who want to stay in the game and then they found, not unsurprisingly, that they had some real quality players who became top-class black coaches. But in this country that’s not happened and we are merely asking for a recruitment process that is open and transparent and does exactly that.”
Taylor follows the former Blackburn manager Paul Ince in calling for the introduction of the Rooney Rule. Ince said of the current system: “I don’t think it’s always been about the best candidate.
“It’s hard to say that the people are racist and won’t give you a job because you’re black, but it does make you wonder why there aren’t so many black managers and coaches.”
The man who gave his name to the rule said that British club owners should recognise that their options would be significantly widened by the addition of black candidates to their shortlists.
Dan Rooney, the owner of Pittsburgh Steelers who helped put forward the NFL regulation in 2002, told the BBC: “I would tell British clubs that if they would look at this openly they will find this is a positive thing.
“The plus side of this is you’re increasing your list of people to look at and it would really work. I couldn’t recommend it enough for the teams in Britain.
“It may take a little bit of work. But it would be a plus to the teams, to the league itself. When you think about it they have nothing to lose.”
The Premier League said: “The situation that brought about the introduction of the ‘Rooney Rule’ in the NFL is markedly different to football. But our ultimate goal is the same.
“What we want to achieve, by working with the FA, Football League, managers and coaches, is more and better coaches coming through the English system who can progress to the highest levels of the game on merit and regardless of race, ethnicity, gender or background.”
I think the rule itself can only be beneficial but wondered what the intricacies of the rules are
it shouldn't affect who actually gets the job
personally i think its a waste of time, if the premise is "chairman of club x is racist" and he/she is made to interview a minority candidate they are not gonna have a road to damascus moment are they, "my GHod, i've never heard zonal marking explained that way before, i renounce my societally ingrained racism!"
How does it work in practice? Do you have invoke it yourself or do you just put 'black manager' on your CV? Does Ryan Giggs count as a black manager?
Er...what??
i think another reason why we see less black managers proportionately, is because of how their playing styles are perceived.
ie. A lot of black players are pacey players (proportionately). And often pace is a big part of their game. Often for these types of players, there is a perception that they lack other skillsets such as "tactical nouse", which are thought to be paramount in a football managers role.
if we go through england players and compare white players to their black counterparts, i hope it illustrates my point:
terry/rio jagielka/lescott baines/cole - comparing these defenders, im sure most people would feel that the white players are tactically superior, whilst the black players are the better athletes.
at rb, all of johnson, walker, richards are perceived as tactically incept
almost all of our cm's are white. i think this suggests that there are perhaps massive problems with how black players are perceived at grass roots level. on the wings, guys like milner and lallana are probably thought to be tactically ahead of guys like townsend, walcott, lennon, young etc.
This is perhaps a problem of how pacey players are perceived. Rather than black vs white players/managers. As pacey white players are also not as readily considered for management roles as far as i can see. Owen, Rommedahl, Gonkjaer, Canniggia etc.
In my opinion, the tactical aspect of management is totally over emphasised (i don't feel its a skill that can be used to differentiate the abilities of managers). Also, im a strong believer that guys like Johnson and Walker are actually tactically very adept. The reason that they are often caught out is because of the way they play. And they position themselves differently because they are so fast. But thats another debate.
Seriously **** off - English clubs' managerial hiring processes are "unfair, exclusive and discriminatory", according to anti-racism charity Kick It Out.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.