• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Will Lankshear

How many prem teams start young strikers?
The prem now feeds off other leagues and developing players is not really a thing either the need for instant impact
It’s quite scary imo
And we’re a club that has HG issues and a real lack of football identity which you get from having investment in players (new and HG)

Young English strikers are rare. I think if he was good enough in the view of the team we wouldn't be selling him is all.
 
Young English strikers are rare. I think if he was good enough in the view of the team we wouldn't be selling him is all.
I don’t think the club cares for or has a plan for young players
I don’t think there is an actual plan at the club tbh
I think the leadership in football terms are yes men and flip depending on the mood
 
Im a bit down that we seem to be just open to letting all our young players go.

First luskovic now Lankshear. he showed real promise towards the end of the championship season. Why would we not at least let him
have pre-season. I want to know why we are ok to let him go.

We also need some home grown players eventually.
 
Need to trust the judgement of the coaching staff at Spurs on Lankshear , if they don't think he is PL level and are willing to advise Vinai/Lange to sell then so be it. What is surprising is that as far as I can see he has never made an apperance for England U21's and when compared to Scarlett's England youth career Will is way behind.

I think it's just short termism. We've got a manager who doesn't stay anywhere longer than 15 months. So we're pawning our future for a present that might not even be that good (back to mid-table from 17th)
 
So he had a very good loan last season and has been training during the off season. You would have thought at the very least he would go on the preseason tour so that the manager would at least have a look at him before any decision was made on his future. It makes absolutely no sense that we sell him right now.

You really have to wonder who is making the decisions here because this makes absolutely no sense.
Im a bit down that we seem to be just open to letting all our young players go.

First luskovic now Lankshear. he showed real promise towards the end of the championship season. Why would we not at least let him
have pre-season. I want to know why we are ok to let him go.

We also need some home grown players eventually.

I think the reality is the squad, and that includes the academy side is too big. Obviously, a decision has been made to cut aggressively (and that includes some risk of mistakes)

Question is (and was for me at start of this), has our spending actually changed? we spent 150M net last summer, if we end up selling Vuskovic, Dragusin, Romero, Bergvall, maybe Spence & Richi plus a host of Academy players, are we really spending any more or just cashing in on assets in a one time way?
 
Not sure of the sauce regarding him expressing a desire to leave, but if true you have to wish him well

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I think it's just short termism. We've got a manager who doesn't stay anywhere longer than 15 months. So we're pawning our future for a present that might not even be that good (back to mid-table from 17th)
Kinsky/Udogie/souza/gray/fernandes/Tel/odobert/Simmons all under 24
4 will be starters when fit

This whole short termism is nonsense
 

According to Lyle and Bridge:


"Middlesbrough have agreed a club-record deal with Tottenham to sign Will Lankshear.

The total package for this transfer, including potential bonuses, means the fee could reach an eventual £20m, Sky Sports News understands.

The initial, fixed part is around £10m.

There is also a 20 per cent sell on clause and Spurs have matching rights on any bids from other clubs in the future.

The striker is due in the north east for a medical today.

The 21-year-old scored 11 goals in 44 Championship appearances while on loan at Oxford United last season. "
 
I think it's just short termism. We've got a manager who doesn't stay anywhere longer than 15 months. So we're pawning our future for a present that might not even be that good (back to mid-table from 17th)
You are wrong.
He was at Sassuolo for around three years.
We are his 4th club since then and there are reasons for him leaving the other three - you will have your own opinion on the validity of those various reasons.
If we are backing this manager with funds, resources, personnel that he wants there's no actual evidence to back up a gut feeling that he'll leave.

And even if you were correct in your analysis of the situation, your final sentence can equally be written 'So we're pawning our future for a present that may be great (back to the top 4 from 17th). Simply perspective/vibes/gut.
 

According to Lyle and Bridge:


"Middlesbrough have agreed a club-record deal with Tottenham to sign Will Lankshear.

The total package for this transfer, including potential bonuses, means the fee could reach an eventual £20m, Sky Sports News understands.

The initial, fixed part is around £10m.

There is also a 20 per cent sell on clause and Spurs have matching rights on any bids from other clubs in the future.

The striker is due in the north east for a medical today.

The 21-year-old scored 11 goals in 44 Championship appearances while on loan at Oxford United last season. "
Considering Boro made the playoffs last season, there's a fair chance of the likely promotion clause coming to fruition.

I wonder how a matching rights thing works; does it simply mean that they cannot reject an offer from us if we match a bid they've accepted from another club? If so, why would they reject it anyway?
 
I am surprised that so many fans do not accept that MOST clubs move on most of the young players that come through. I have no idea if Lankshear will reach the top or not but the truth is that ALL clubs move on young players in the game.
Agree that this sort of sale is common in football, part of me is disappointed still. Is he the only player we have had who won that PL2 POTY award? Would have liked to see him do well at us but that’s true of all our players
 
I am surprised that so many fans do not accept that MOST clubs move on most of the young players that come through. I have no idea if Lankshear will reach the top or not but the truth is that ALL clubs move on young players in the game.
The main function of a top club's academy is surely that it produces young players who can go on to have careers somewhere in the game and the club usually get recompense for that.
It's a pleasant but rare happenstance that it actually produces a first team player for the club.
 
Agree that this sort of sale is common in football, part of me is disappointed still. Is he the only player we have had who won that PL2 POTY award? Would have liked to see him do well at us but that’s true of all our players

I understand the disappointment i really do but its what all clubs do, as i say i hope Lankshear goes out and proves the club wrong.


The main function of a top club's academy is surely that it produces young players who can go on to have careers somewhere in the game and the club usually get recompense for that.
It's a pleasant but rare happenstance that it actually produces a first team player for the club.

Indeed.
 
Back