• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT - Fulham vs Tottenham Hotspur

Tudor should just say publicly in his next presser that the next time he sees any more PGMOL corruption he's bringing his players off the pitch.

Give that T W A T Webb something to think about. Raise the stakes.
 
Minimal contact , Reffing aside.

That’s poor as it gets from your CB. Danso is far superior.

Dragusin is not good enough. Another black mark against our shambolic recruitment.
 
Just like last week I don't really think it was a foul, but for some reason ours against Arsenal was given but this one wasn't.

So you're telling me the laws allows a striker to raise 2 hands and push the player in the back. In what parallel universe is that the laws of the game. It was a crystal clear foul. That is, if you use the laws of the game.
 
We were told he was a player, but is he actually? Personally I would play him but the coach is the who sees him in training. Maybe hes not up to speed as yet or capable?
No idea
But we know he is a left back
Imo that has to be better than playing a CM out of position
 
Commentator talking rubbish. It’s going on Dragusins head.
And whether ot is doesn't really matter, he is on the ground for the next situation where the goal goes in because of the push and unable to interfere, clearly a punishable foul. VAR is getting beyond ridiculos now.
 
Back