Foul or not - if Dragusin isn't brick, the question doesn't exist
The difference is the onfield decision was differentThey’re saying “it’s completely different”..
I really genuinely don’t understand.
they talk brick just to back up the refs and hide the fact it’s all bs…They’re saying “it’s completely different”..
I really genuinely don’t understand.
The only precedent the refs set is to do whatever they can to ensure there's no fudging consistency in decisions whatsoever.Last week they set the precedent
fudge me. I know we are brick. But getting but fudged by the officials every week isn't helping.
Just like last week I don't really think it was a foul, but for some reason ours against Arsenal was given but this one wasn't.
No ideaWe were told he was a player, but is he actually? Personally I would play him but the coach is the who sees him in training. Maybe hes not up to speed as yet or capable?
not even surprised it would standYou just knew we'd concede a goal like that after last week
And whether ot is doesn't really matter, he is on the ground for the next situation where the goal goes in because of the push and unable to interfere, clearly a punishable foul. VAR is getting beyond ridiculos now.Commentator talking rubbish. It’s going on Dragusins head.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.