• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT - Tottenham Hotspur vs Smoggies in FA Cup

Man of the match


  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know what you're saying but Moura wins many more headers than Kane. They're knock one though, if you're talking about holding it up I agree.

We shouldn’t be playing them with Kane either. He looks depressed going for long balls, and stops trying after a while. Basically this squad is not designed for long balls and I hope Mourinho is flexible enough to forego them.
 

Sigh. Really? Are you telling me you have forgotten all the points out forward in other threads? You know, consistently fails to be positionally sound, when in a four takes out one of our own DMs who has to cover thus leaving us light in there and swarmable? Those sorts of points? I think you’re being mischievous myself...
 
Another formation. Players starting in attacking combinations they've never players before again.
Every time we got the ball the player had to actually look up and see where their teammates where.
That extra touch slowed down our game and we could create no real passing patterns.
They were able to put in blocks and get players back into position.

Surely as a new manager coming in you decide on a formation and get the players to stick to it while they get used to playing your system.
Poch played the same 4231 for two seasons when he came in.
 
Another formation. Players starting in attacking combinations they've never players before again.
Every time we got the ball the player had to actually look up and see where their teammates where.
That extra touch slowed down our game and we could create no real passing patterns.
They were able to put in blocks and get players back into position.

Surely as a new manager coming in you decide on a formation and get the players to stick to it while they get used to playing your system.
Poch played the same 4231 for two seasons when he came in.

I’m assuming he is trying to find a formation that suits the players he has so he can go through evolution rather than revolution
Sensible approach IMO
 
Sigh. Really? Are you telling me you have forgotten all the points out forward in other threads? You know, consistently fails to be positionally sound, when in a four takes out one of our own DMs who has to cover thus leaving us light in there and swarmable? Those sorts of points? I think you’re being mischievous myself...
We haven't really been playing a 4 though.... it's pretty much a 3 with Verts playing as a left sided centre half.

If you think Aurier is doing anything other than what Mourinho is asking him to do with his positioning then I question your sanity.
 
Another formation. Players starting in attacking combinations they've never players before again.
Every time we got the ball the player had to actually look up and see where their teammates where.
That extra touch slowed down our game and we could create no real passing patterns.
They were able to put in blocks and get players back into position.

Surely as a new manager coming in you decide on a formation and get the players to stick to it while they get used to playing your system.
Poch played the same 4231 for two seasons when he came in.

Mouriho is having the same issue Poch had with the players avaialble being a mixture of not good enough, heads not in the right place and various other things like injuries and suspensions - both were/are looking to juggle things around in the hope of something clicking/making the most of whats there any given week.

funny how we're not seeing the same level of micro analysis of the current managers decisions in team selections as we did with the previous though
 
Did you think Dele played well today? I am generally a big advocate of his but I thought today he was appalling.

I thought he was stodgy and ended up playing three positions in one game. Had Kane been fit we might’ve rested him; he needs one. I did not think he was nearly as terrible as half here, I thought he was put in positions throughout the match which don’t suit him. When he plays off Kane there is natural rhythm. Even with Sonny he has that but Sonny was very rusty today. Add the fact that playing off Moura is tough for anyone and I think he is compromised. He ended up dropping deep to allow LoCelso and Lamela the space today; again not his position. He ks an easy target IMO.
 
Did you think Dele played well today? I am generally a big advocate of his but I thought today he was appalling. It was a George Weah's cousin type performance

You’ve factored in that he’s played way too much football in the last 2 months? He’s knackered imo and is coming too deep again.
 
You’ve factored in that he’s played way too much football in the last 2 months? He’s knackered imo and is coming too deep again.

Do you not feel his poor form has been ongoing over an extended period of time? IMO his performances fell off a cliff after the last season at WHL.
 
1st half we were very laboured.
2nd half ditching a centre back [effectively] for Lo Celso made a big difference.

Aurier had acres of space to play with and did put in some good crosses, but by GHod he is not a defender, his first thought is never to sprint back and defend, he just watches the other defenders and tries to work out whether he might be required to run back too. We must have a better winger than this guy?
 
I thought he was stodgy and ended up playing three positions in one game. Had Kane been fit we might’ve rested him; he needs one. I did not think he was nearly as terrible as half here, I thought he was put in positions throughout the match which don’t suit him. When he plays off Kane there is natural rhythm. Even with Sonny he has that but Sonny was very rusty today. Add the fact that playing off Moura is tough for anyone and I think he is compromised. He ended up dropping deep to allow LoCelso and Lamela the space today; again not his position. He ks an easy target IMO.
So his poor performance was everybody else's fault but his?

Once he dropped deeper he actually improved IMO as he was a disaster when further forward and Lo Celso and Lamela showed up how bad he was by showing how easy it was to make things happen in the final third by injecting some pace into the attack.
 
Sad to see the decline of Dier gather pace too. Looked very, very shaky when only faced with sporadic and quite routine attacking forays from Boro. Don't see him as a centre half at all.
 
So his poor performance was everybody else's fault but his?

Once he dropped deeper he actually improved IMO as he was a disaster when further forward and Lo Celso and Lamela showed up how bad he was by showing how easy it was to make things happen in the final third by injecting some pace into the attack.

Yes, everyone else it to blame. It would seem.
 
We haven't really been playing a 4 though.... it's pretty much a 3 with Verts playing as a left sided centre half.

If you think Aurier is doing anything other than what Mourinho is asking him to do with his positioning then I question your sanity.

So...first off, do you think Mourinho asks him to switch off like he does defensively? Question what you like, I think to suggest as much as ludicrous. Secondly, he has played the three more recently but it has not been his common shape. That has been 4-2-3-1. If you want to go through match by match I’d be happy to. Thirdly, and this is the one place I agree, Aurier is Aurier. He can be great going forward, albeit erratic, and he is not a great defender. So it is on the manager when he plays him. I am personally baffled Mourinho persists with him, it must be for what he hopes he can bring going forwards. Let’s see how he does next weekend; I predict he will cost us at least one goal if not more depending on shape.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back