ricky2tricky4city
Colin Calderwood
So I take it that you're going to be nicer to the scousers and their team?A society where we punish success less is a fairer society.
So I take it that you're going to be nicer to the scousers and their team?A society where we punish success less is a fairer society.
Iran is actually a very civilised and well educated country. Left to its own devices its probably as ripe as anywhere in the Middle East for an organic progression to liberal democracy.
fudging with them when they've got a liberal president like Rouhani trying to counterbalance the Ayatollah is a really stupid idea
A million times more progressive on things like education and female emancipation than (America's bitch) the Saudis too
A society where we punish success less is a fairer society.
Dude genuinely, before we think about cutting tax for those of us that earn over 50k we need to look at reversing the savage cuts inflicted by the Tories.
I don't want taxes to go up, but I don't think it's the right time for a tax cut either, think about the state of the country now, the divisions that are part of society are largely due to the skewed distribution of those that have too much and those that have too little.
Earning 50k-80k does not mean you are well off at all (especially in London) but it is a lot more then those that struggle to get by, while working hard. So no Boris can't bribe me with a tax cut.
Fund public services properly, produce a incremental raised tax system for those earning 150k to 100million. Then I'm for a cut to middle class tax.
Your post relies on two fairly hefty assumptions there.Dude genuinely, before we think about cutting tax for those of us that earn over 50k we need to look at reversing the savage cuts inflicted by the Tories.
If those earning less wish to create a divide out of spite and petty jealousy, stealing from the successful and handing it out to the spiteful is not the right answer. Where there is disparity in opportunity, I can understand frustration (whilst not divide), but I cannot by any means understand, condone or reward resentment of success.I don't want taxes to go up, but I don't think it's the right time for a tax cut either, think about the state of the country now, the divisions that are part of society are largely due to the skewed distribution of those that have too much and those that have too little.
Earning pretty much any wage means you're better off than many somewhere - government handouts in this country would make one reasonably wealthy from a worldwide viewpoint. We can't simply tax more until everyone is equally poor - if we do then the Corbyns have won!Earning 50k-80k does not mean you are well off at all (especially in London) but it is a lot more then those that struggle to get by, while working hard. So no Boris can't bribe me with a tax cut.
How much do you think increasing the tax rate in that region would increase tax revenue? My estimate is £0. I won't be exactly right, but I bet I won't be far off.Fund public services properly, produce a incremental raised tax system for those earning 150k to 100million. Then I'm for a cut to middle class tax.
Popbitch said:>> Johnson & “Johnson” <<
The further adventures of Boris
The Telegraph pays him £275,000 a year. The Evening Standard is edited by a fellow Bullingdon boy. The Guardian is too puritanical to get properly stuck into the muck and journalists at the Mail are already being courted for potential comms gigs at No.10 – so it looks like no-one's going to bother asking this question unless we do...
Pundits have wondered why Boris Johnson and his team seem so keen to avoid addressing the substance of this "lovers' tiff". If anyone could bluster his way through some half-arsed excuse and emerge unscathed, it's him.
Could it be that the row he had with Carrie Symonds in her Camberwell flat actually went on significantly longer than has been reported so far – and that it contained many more personal details about the current state of his relationships?
------------------
Yes, that's relationships plural; no, we don't mean Bip Ling. (We'd have headlined the story "Bip Questions: Who's askLing what this week?" if we did...)
Did you read behind the paywall? I can pm a copy if you're interested (although 25p is fairly cheap for an article).
Edit:
Oh, nearly forgot. Yeah but £500 a month though.
Dude genuinely, before we think about cutting tax for those of us that earn over 50k we need to look at reversing the savage cuts inflicted by the Tories.
I don't want taxes to go up, but I don't think it's the right time for a tax cut either, think about the state of the country now, the divisions that are part of society are largely due to the skewed distribution of those that have too much and those that have too little.
Earning 50k-80k does not mean you are well off at all (especially in London) but it is a lot more then those that struggle to get by, while working hard. So no Boris can't bribe me with a tax cut.
Fund public services properly, produce a incremental raised tax system for those earning 150k to 100million. Then I'm for a cut to middle class tax.
Good post, one bit I think we could change is with is the taxation. A rise from 20% basic rate to 40% for middle earners is too much. Especially when the jump from middle to high is only 5%.
If anything it should be the other way round, 20% basic, 30% middle and 50% high.
I agree with that, I also think small incremental increases for higher earners over the 50% would be a good idea, together with the closing of tax loop holes and prevention of offshoring in tax havens, would help provide a fairer society... Providing it's not going to be spunked up the wall in a war with Iran or something.
Did you read behind the paywall? I can pm a copy if you're interested (although 25p is fairly cheap for an article).
Edit:
Oh, nearly forgot. Yeah but £500 a month though.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.