Most ridiculous rule, clearly went for the ball which would effect lloris thinking. Surely must count as active.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
*** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chelsea *** OMT
- Thread starter Papercut
- Start date
Most ridiculous rule, clearly went for the ball which would effect lloris thinking. Surely must count as active.
Rorschach
Sonny Walters
This is where the law is an ass, so to speak. The initial shot went a few inches by Costa's boot and he was stood in an offside position. If he touches it he is offside but he didn't so technically is not, but either way he is affecting Lloris decision to some extent. In the second phase of play he has gained an advantage from being offside and inactive in the first phase of play. So he is not technically not offside either but I think this is a flaw in the rule. I think the rule needs to be amended that Costa cannot become active in the next phase of play. In saying that it's already too complicated so I can imagine how hard this would be to implement.
Rorschach
Sonny Walters
it wasn't really and rather a weird thing to highlight I thought.
Well to me (law regardless) there is a difference when a player stands still (ala Eriksen for our goal a week or so ago) vs. Costa tried to hit the ball and ****ing missed ..
If you actually made a play for it, it shouldn't really be only if you touched it .. obviously Costa trying to touch the ball will put both Lloris & defenders off
Superted
Jonathan Woodgate
I remember reading a quote from an old manager that if you're not interfering with play, you shouldn't be on the pitch.
Everyone is interfering to some extent even if just putting some doubt in the defenders mind.
I just don't see why they don't do away with the whole "active" component and have offside as being offside regardless.
Everyone is interfering to some extent even if just putting some doubt in the defenders mind.
I just don't see why they don't do away with the whole "active" component and have offside as being offside regardless.
Re: *** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chel53a *** OMT
Or do you mean "At Courtois passed Five" ?
PHP:
Or do you mean "At Courtois passed Five" ?
thfcsteff
Terry Dyson
Agreed.
Jose's a pantomime bully...he knew what he was doing, he's onto the next game, putting more pressure on refs. He will know only too well that their first could've been called offside easily (and should have been), that Cahill could've got his marching papers and that his side were simply not there today. He's being decent in protecting them but he knows he needs them.
Having said that, he remains an absolute c**t!
He will have nightmares about Kane & Chadli for some time
metalgear
Nayim
Need that gif to immortalize his kick into Kane's back while he was on the ground.
Did you see the westham v arsenal goal that was disallowed, either both offside or neither. Westham were not in the way of the keeper
Baleforce
Ron Henry
I wouldn't mind it if the defenders could be deemed inactive as well, you can be offside for the whole move then tap in at the end from an onside position and it's fine, yet a defender can be on his **** 40 yards away and be playing everyone on
it's always in the attackers favour these days, I'm fed up with this constant obsession football has with scoring goals
Rob
Peter Taylor
It's here...
http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/c...ed-stamped-on-tottenhams-harry-kane-pictures/
Doesn't then show Jose point for a Chelsea throw without a seconds thought
http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/c...ed-stamped-on-tottenhams-harry-kane-pictures/
Doesn't then show Jose point for a Chelsea throw without a seconds thought
DHSF
Les Ferdinand
Now one bad game doesnt make him overrated or a poor defender. I think he is a good defender yes he was bullied by Kane but that performance yesterday not many could have lived with.
Gazza Dazzla
Chris Perry
Re: *** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chel53a *** OMT
Not sure whether this is your opinion or the reason you've heard why it wasn't given, but it's complete rubbish. The lino missed the offside and they're (the officials and pundits) retrospectively making stuff up to fit the decision made. Costa was an inch away from touching the ball, he was in the line of the shooting player and Lloris, it was a text book offside.
Not sure whether this is your opinion or the reason you've heard why it wasn't given, but it's complete rubbish. The lino missed the offside and they're (the officials and pundits) retrospectively making stuff up to fit the decision made. Costa was an inch away from touching the ball, he was in the line of the shooting player and Lloris, it was a text book offside.
Bedfordspurs
Martin Peters
Re: *** Tottenham Hotspur vs Chel53a *** OMT
MOTD highlighted it really well
I did think that Matic had no support though from Fibreglass who was awful though
MOTD highlighted it really well
I did think that Matic had no support though from Fibreglass who was awful though
paxtonwolf
John White
Papercuts dream
There are deffo 3 goals so one of the teams and SS...
\o/
There are deffo 3 goals so one of the teams and SS...
\o/
Pirate55
The Last Man Standing 17/18
I thought it was really interesting analysis. Eriksen dragging Matic away from his usual positioning in front of their two CBs exposed Terry and Carthorse to a rampant Kane and Chadders. Result - carnage!