• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Harrys Trial

Can't Harry just say he was off balance....? THAT seems to get you off most crimes at the moment!!
 
Gutter Boy said:
I was confident he was going down till Talksport blabbed the Storrie and Mandaric verdict.

This is a complete dead duck now.
Click to expand...
And brought up in court today:
Judge Anthony Leonard told jurors to "leave prejudice or favour behind" as a panel of eight men and four women were sworn in. "The defendants are two well-known personalities within the world of football," he said.

He said football "almost overwhelms other aspects in life" as he ordered jurors to focus solely on the charges. "It can prejudice if you hold such allegiances or prejudices towards clubs that the defendants were or are presently involved with."

Jurors were also told to inform the judge if they had listened to an episode of Talksport radio on November 17 last year.
 
James Pearce @Pearcesport 1m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Monaco account not in Redknapp's name. Was called "Rosie 47". Prosecution say this was combination of his dog's name and his year of birth


James Pearce @Pearcesport 3m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Prosecution allege that Redknapp instead received secret payment from Mandaric and in April 2002 Redknapp flew to Monaco to open account


James Pearce @Pearcesport 5m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Prosecution say Redknapp's share of Crouch transfer was ?ú115,473. Would have been double if contract not changed


James Pearce @Pearcesport 7m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Prosecution say Crouch sold just 9 days after new Redknapp contract reduced his share from 10% to 5%


James Pearce @Pearcesport 9m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Jury told example of Peter Crouch. Bought for ?ú1.25 million and sold for ?ú4.5 million
 
Willy said:
And brought up in court today:
Judge Anthony Leonard told jurors to "leave prejudice or favour behind" as a panel of eight men and four women were sworn in. "The defendants are two well-known personalities within the world of football," he said.

He said football "almost overwhelms other aspects in life" as he ordered jurors to focus solely on the charges. "It can prejudice if you hold such allegiances or prejudices towards clubs that the defendants were or are presently involved with."

Jurors were also told to inform the judge if they had listened to an episode of Talksport radio on November 17 last year.
Click to expand...

What was said in this show, does anyone know?
(if you are allowed to repeat it)
 
James Pearce @Pearcesport 1m Reply Retweet Favorite ?À Open
Monaco account not in Redknapp's name. Was called "Rosie 47". Prosecution say this was combination of his dog's name and his year of birth

This did make me chuckle!!!
 
LOL, as Benny would say! You'd think that if you're gonna have a secret foreign bank account under a pseudonym, you wouldn't choose one so easily linked back to yourself.

Following the prosecution evidence on twitter, it doesn't sound good for Harry does it? Unless the evidence against him is somehow made up, not actually his bank account, etc., it's hard to see how he can get out of it (from a layman's point of view, at least, his defence council surely has something up his sleeve?!).
 
EJG said:
LOL, as Benny would say! You'd think that if you're gonna have a secret foreign bank account under a pseudonym, you wouldn't choose one so easily linked back to yourself.

Following the prosecution evidence on twitter, it doesn't sound good for Harry does it? Unless the evidence against him is somehow made up, not actually his bank account, etc., it's hard to see how he can get out of it (from a layman's point of view, at least, his defence council surely has something up his sleeve?!).
Click to expand...

youd hope so. Mandaric has a Lord QC
 
EJG said:
LOL, as Benny would say! You'd think that if you're gonna have a secret foreign bank account under a pseudonym, you wouldn't choose one so easily linked back to yourself.

Following the prosecution evidence on twitter, it doesn't sound good for Harry does it? Unless the evidence against him is somehow made up, not actually his bank account, etc., it's hard to see how he can get out of it (from a layman's point of view, at least, his defence council surely has something up his sleeve?!).
Click to expand...

He will appeal when he loses. As long as he only gets a fine. It all good for Spurs.
 
Redknapp's defense council must have something to argue the case or they would not have pleaded not guilty. They are not going in empty handed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back