• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Footballers not understanding how to behave off the pitch…

Haha yeah alright petal. Thought it was the other bond villain that kept cats. Either way you think it is acceptable to keep pets that is your business, despite or maybe because of the growing evidence of pet's carbon footprint I don't care about people keeping pet's, none of my business.

But pooping in my garden is not has never been and never will be acceptable. Funny enough a friend in the pub said he leaves out milk with windscreen washer so they drink it but get so sick they not to go back there.

I would imagine that is against some sort of law so I would never do that, oh no I would never do that, horrible thing to do which as I said no one should ever do, terrible thing I would never condone.
If I knew where you lived I'd brick on your lawn too.
 
Arrested again for breaching bail terms. Ridiculous

Still receiving his 75k a week salary. Would it not have been within remit to place it in a holding account until charges were either proven or dropped? If found guilty (and I am pretty comfortable saying that appears to be the case) will he be told to return the wages he has been receiving dating back to the moment of initial arrest? These crimes surely breach his terms of employment don’t they?
 
Still receiving his 75k a week salary. Would it not have been within remit to place it in a holding account until charges were either proven or dropped? If found guilty (and I am pretty comfortable saying that appears to be the case) will he be told to return the wages he has been receiving dating back to the moment of initial arrest? These crimes surely breach his terms of employment don’t they?

Because I believe you can't suspend someone without pay unless it's a contractual part of the disciplinary process. And I doubt there are many contracts, and especially not for professional footballers, that would have that as a right for the employer. Far too open to abuse.
Plus it could maybe be seen as pre-judging an outcome.
So premier league footballer or not, he's as entitled to his salary as anyone else undergoing a criminal investigation or disciplinary action.
He's probably also missing out on a whole host of bonuses, so the £75kpw is probably less than that. (And yes, I realise how ridiculous that sounds!).

If that in anyway sounds as if I am defending him, I am absolutely not doing so. Scumbag of the highest (lowest?) order and I hope he gets everything he deserves.
But as in many cases, laws that are there to protect the many also benefit those on the extremes who may be less deserving.
 
Because I believe you can't suspend someone without pay unless it's a contractual part of the disciplinary process. And I doubt there are many contracts, and especially not for professional footballers, that would have that as a right for the employer. Far too open to abuse.
Plus it could maybe be seen as pre-judging an outcome.
So premier league footballer or not, he's as entitled to his salary as anyone else undergoing a criminal investigation or disciplinary action.
He's probably also missing out on a whole host of bonuses, so the £75kpw is probably less than that. (And yes, I realise how ridiculous that sounds!).

If that in anyway sounds as if I am defending him, I am absolutely not doing so. Scumbag of the highest (lowest?) order and I hope he gets everything he deserves.
But as in many cases, laws that are there to protect the many also benefit those on the extremes who may be less deserving.

This is true however I would imagine there would be room to act for him breaking bail terms
 
Back