-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Dane Scarlett
- Thread starter SteveAWOL
- Start date
The Fatman
Espen Baardsen
Dare i say (future) captain Scarlett
Modric THFC
Jimmy McCormick
Mourinho admits this is just about Mourinho
Previously https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jul/06/jose-mourinho-list-young-players-fact-fiction
Previously https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jul/06/jose-mourinho-list-young-players-fact-fiction
spurspinter1
Paul Stalteri
And? it is also extremely relevant/important to Scarlett, he gets a debut that sets an age record, feels a PL win and is given a carrot to work even harder for.
Scarlett is going to see Jose Mourinho on tv say he (Jose) needed to give him his debut because he (Scarlett) is going to be someone big, any idea what a self belief boost that could be?
This is like complaining someone gave money to charity for a tax break .. so what? the hungry person who got fed doesn't give a fudge
90291Spur
Les Ferdinand
Also, it means that if he gets more than 90 seconds and is required to make a significant contribution it won’t be in his debut. Those nerves will not be there as he’ll already have had that time.
JerusalemMan
Johnny Morrison
He did not admit it was just about Mourinho.
In the radio interview (and in the article you quoted) he gave three reasons, only one of which was that he wanted to be the one to give Scarlett his first start.
He referenced the benefit for the player and the academy as well.
So pretty disingenuous of you.
braineclipse
Willie Hall
It would have been leveled as a criticism of Mourinho even if he hadn't mentioned it himself. Just Mourinho being Mourinho and I don't see it as a problem.
He's given a slight amount of game time to a very young player when the opportunity arose. Good.
Bishop
Terry Venables
I think that was already pretty obvious. [emoji1787][emoji1787][emoji1787]
metalgear
Nayim
If I were Vinicius I would not be bothered with just a minute left
Sent from my SM-T865 using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Sent from my SM-T865 using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Bedfordspurs
Martin Peters
I was told by a Villa scout that both him and Etete will be
Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
Wow!.... Rated even more highly than I thought.
Notmegov
Roman Pavlyuchenko
On Dane Scarlett: "He is a diamond, a kid with incredible potential. He has worked many times with the first team and that gives him a different personality. He is still 16, 17 soon and I believe next season he will be a first team squad player because he has a lot of talent. He is going to be a fantastic player and I hope everything around him goes well. He is a striker, a number nine, I have been playing him from the sides similar to Marcus Rashford and is very clever."
Finney Is Back
Luka Modric
My worry with Etete is his size.... I mean that because he was very big and strong, very young, and often those players do not develop as much skill and anticipation as they can just blow the opposition away by their size until they get to about 17, 18.
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
Love seeing young players coming through.
Yes, saw that too. It might mean that we re-consider whether we want to shell out cash on Vinicius in the summer, particularly in a window when we might not have that much cash and some urgent priorities.
For example, could we go with Kane, Son, Scarlett and Parrott as CF options next season and not spend a penny on a CF?
If that's not enough, what about finding a Llorente Mk II who, given current financial conditions, you might get for say £5m - £10m.
I wonder whether we need to spent £20m - £25m on a CF who is mid-career (even if Vinicius did play better tonight)