• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

Been thinking about this. It could be a juve type deal. Richarlison for €70m. They buy winks €35m, moura €30m or Bergwijn €35m. Clears up their ffp problem. We get rid of 2 players not wanted.

Everyone over priced, but doesn't matter as little or no cash is really exchanged.

Would this also cut watford out of their 10%?
 
We have a DoF, we don't know who is a Conte target. Richarlson could just he one of a number of players on Paraticis shortlist
True, but there are very few quality players out there who can play anywhere across the front line, are sure to adapt to the prem, and are available. So, although Richarlison is probably one player on Paratici's list, it's gotta be a very short list.
 
Exactly, you think having him stuck behind Deki, Kane and Son on the bench would a good thing when he is a known strop head.

Also I cant remember a time anyone on here said "I tell you what I would take Him" before today. Literally on no ones wish list unless your talking the internet wish where you hope for better and he rocks up
It'll be 4 players for 3 positions and Kane, Son, and Deki can't start every game. There will be plenty of starts for him and he has the talent and graft to push our established starting 3.
 
Looks like there is a take over bid for Everton, which I’m sure will affect this
Not really
They still need to sell to buy even with potential new owners

on a side note I was chatting to an Everton season ticket holder mate

he thinks he operates best down the left and sees him as a son cover signing if we were to buy him
 
Is Richarlison any good off the right? Only seen him through the middle or off the left. I’d still prefer Raphinha as Kulu is the one likely to be rotated out the most though he’d probs be more expensive.
 
Is Richarlison any good off the right? Only seen him through the middle or off the left. I’d still prefer Raphinha as Kulu is the one likely to be rotated out the most though he’d probs be more expensive.
Not really IMO
But again Kulu is just gonna get better and with a better wing back he may need lest rest
We do need IMO cover for all 3 attacking roles and Richarlson can do two well enough, although probably not for the fee, but that’s the prem premium
 
The other benefit of Richarlison is he could come on to see a game out by holding the ball up and drawing free kicks, which Kane does excellently but I always worry it could come at the expense of his ankles / body in general.
 
I think Richarlison would potentially give us a(n aerial) target to hit, which we’ve been lacking, and therefore an ability to mix things up. He is very good in the air.

He knows the league too, whereas someone like Scamacca would likely have to adapt.

It’s potentially a lot of money, but I’m not sure I see a lot of other options that are quite as ‘oven-ready’ to help us achieve Conte’s aim of winning now.
 
I'd admit he's a player who has annoyed me with his antics and surly demeanor, and that's saying something considering he doesn't play for a big team. ie rival. But,of course, when he's your own 'annoying bastard' you see things thru a different lense:).

He ticks a lot of boxes. Prem ready (remember he was decent at Watford as well). Covers across the line. Could play in a two. He may of annoyed opposition fans but I never remember him annoying his own fans or manager in fact their forums say he has excellent work rate and commitment. Been around a while but is still just 25. If he works out we have to remember Kane and Son are getting no younger.

£50m is a fair price imo.

Ps. Never underestimate an annoying player, they can be massively useful in big games to rile the opposition and make them lose focus.
 
Back