• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Anyone got elon musks number? Just sold $5bn of his shares in tesla. Bit of a taco but he has enough money to buy us.
 
Fudge no, there is something deeply disturbing about that guy.

True but he's one of the richest men in the world and getting richer (the charging points will be the real money maker, imagine how much exxonmobil is worth.) No human rights abuses as far as i know.

Not gonna happen anyway though.
 
Last edited:
With player amortisation they could get him. The price is spread over the contract.
As far as I'm aware player amortisation isn't used here, but could be totally wrong. The payments out (transfer wages etc) made are all that matters.
 
As far as I'm aware player amortisation isn't used here, but could be totally wrong. The payments out (transfer wages etc) made are all that matters.

Probably. But uefa uses player amortisation when working out ffp.

The graph isn't really that much help. Without a breakdown of how it's worked out. Ffp is calculated over 3 years normally (4 due to covid). So the last 2 years will have to be taken into account aswell as the next 2.

Anyway. Uefa are looking to bring in a salary cap to replace ffp anyway, so it's all a bit moot.
 
Are we hiding 400m somewhere, or is this a completely irrelevant piece of maths?
It basically just shows what we’d be allowed to spend if the owners injected liquidity themselves or diluted their stake to do so, or loaded more debt onto THFC (though we have quite enough of that already thanks).
 
Back