• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Chairman

Is there any actual proof any of this is happening?

Quotes from Levy/Paratici/Fonseca/Gattuso.

The extent some of our fan base go to, to defend Daniel Levy, is truly remarkable.

Let's say your right, none of it is true (clearly not the case given establishes journalists such as Ornstein have reported it) but let's try your way.

We're still managerless after two months of sacking our manager. What exactly was the plan here? You're saying that this was intended, that we have actually chosen to forego having a manager for this long?

Whilst Leicester are already making transfers you're assuming Levy isn't actually speaking to any of these names but purposely playing a long game... Why exactly?

Those magic beans work wonders.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
 
Those magic beans work wonders.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app

Something a hell of a lot stronger then beans haha

No one can defend Levy anymore, it is like that weird Iraqi guy in the war who kept saying they had won while American tanks rolled passed in the back ground.

Levy needs to go as far as I am concerned. The very least he can do is remove himself from the transfer committee and that Rebecca woman as well.

Give a director of football financial parameters to work within fine, but Levy should fcuk off.
 
The extent some of our fan base go to, to defend Daniel Levy, is truly remarkable.

Let's say your right, none of it is true (clearly not the case given establishes journalists such as Ornstein have reported it) but let's try your way.

We're still managerless after two months of sacking our manager. What exactly was the plan here? You're saying that this was intended, that we have actually chosen to forego having a manager for this long?

Whilst Leicester are already making transfers you're assuming Levy isn't actually speaking to any of these names but purposely playing a long game... Why exactly?

Those magic beans work wonders.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app


Being guilty of one thing, not appointing a manager in two months is pretty bad, does not make you guilty of every other brick journos want to throw at you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DTA
Something a hell of a lot stronger then beans haha

No one can defend Levy anymore, it is like that weird Iraqi guy in the war who kept saying they had won while American tanks rolled passed in the back ground.

Levy needs to go as far as I am concerned. The very least he can do is remove himself from the transfer committee and that Rebecca woman as well.

Give a director of football financial parameters to work within fine, but Levy should fcuk off.

If the Guttuso approach was true then the only thing this DOF should be getting is a P45.

Levy has enough credit in the bank for me, I remember how shiiiiiit we were before he rocked up. He has grown us through his strength of will and acumen.

Although the last few months have been harder to defend
 
Being guilty of one thing, not appointing a manager in two months is pretty bad, does not make you guilty of every other brick journos want to throw at you.

i dont think any of the journos are throwing anything. Ornstein is an incredibly respected journalist and is known for close links to both Tottenham and especially Arsenal.

Ali Gold also established as being a mouthpiece for the club by all intents and purposes.

You're insinuating both are making up Gattuso links to throw brick at Levy, which quite frankly, seems remarkable. If this was The Sun newspaper throwing it out then i'd 100% back you. But again, these aren't red top journalists.

I assume we weren't in for Conte, Poch, Fonseca either, and all these journalists are throwing random names out and clubbing together to form some anti-Levy phalanx.
 
Asking for evidence doesn't really seem like going to such great lengths to defend someone to me

So again, let's assume every respected journalist and close link to the club is telling porkies.

It's been 2 months since we sacked our manager, other clubs are moving forward, and we have no one at the helm, so identifying targets, gaps, improvements, sales, is difficult when you don't know what the manager wants or needs.

"Fail to plan, plan to fail" goes the old adage.
 
Sometimes -and I will add, not all the time, just sometimes- when it acts like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, well, it is, in fact, a duck.
Let's see the proof then? Thought you mods were meant to mediate rather than lose your brick?
 
So again, let's assume every respected journalist and close link to the club is telling porkies.

It's been 2 months since we sacked our manager, other clubs are moving forward, and we have no one at the helm, so identifying targets, gaps, improvements, sales, is difficult when you don't know what the manager wants or needs.

"Fail to plan, plan to fail" goes the old adage.
I think their reporting what they hear
I’d question the source myself
I think there is a fear of actual l knowledge now so they just rinse and repeat
Let’s be honest for them all to hear at the same time it wouldn’t be impossible… yet most report it at the same time as the gospel
 
Let's see the proof then? Thought you mods were meant to mediate rather than lose your brick?

So if something is being widely reported by a number of sources you need proof of it happening?

What is the proof talks have not happened?

No one is losing their brick - I think most are just laughing at the situation as we are being run by someone that either has been rejected by a number of choices, or has taken 2 months to appoint someone/start discussions with someone.
 
So if something is being widely reported by a number of sources you need proof of it happening?

What is the proof talks have not happened?

No one is losing their brick - I think most are just laughing at the situation as we are being run by someone that either has been rejected by a number of choices, or has taken 2 months to appoint someone/start discussions with someone.

exactly. We're a laughing stock publicly. This is peak West Ham levels, not Tottenham.
 
So again, let's assume every respected journalist and close link to the club is telling porkies.

It's been 2 months since we sacked our manager, other clubs are moving forward, and we have no one at the helm, so identifying targets, gaps, improvements, sales, is difficult when you don't know what the manager wants or needs.

"Fail to plan, plan to fail" goes the old adage.

Respected journos - you mean twitter gossip queens? Do me a favour... and as for Ally Gold and co they have shown themselves up as no better than the rest with their done in 48 hour nonsense every time we're linked to someone.

I agree the time taken so far is a joke and there seems to be no obvious sign of a plan - that's enough to gripe about rather than swallowing everything you read on twitter just because it's open season on the owners.
 
i dont think any of the journos are throwing anything. Ornstein is an incredibly respected journalist and is known for close links to both Tottenham and especially Arsenal.

Ali Gold also established as being a mouthpiece for the club by all intents and purposes.

You're insinuating both are making up Gattuso links to throw brick at Levy, which quite frankly, seems remarkable. If this was The Sun newspaper throwing it out then i'd 100% back you. But again, these aren't red top journalists.

I assume we weren't in for Conte, Poch, Fonseca either, and all these journalists are throwing random names out and clubbing together to form some anti-Levy phalanx.

I'm not claiming they are doing it to get at Levy, I'm claiming they are doing it because they have nothing else to write about.
they are rehashing rumours coming from very unreliable sources, as backed up by Kilpatrick latest unrevealed candidates tweet.
 
Sometimes -and I will add, not all the time, just sometimes- when it acts like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, well, it is, in fact, a duck.

And with Real Madrid having filled their vacancy, you can only really go one place, mate ... come on home. Call me naive, but for every day now I just want papa Poch back, regardless of his lemons and cow allegories.



Quack! Quack!
 
So if something is being widely reported by a number of sources you need proof of it happening?

What is the proof talks have not happened?

No one is losing their brick - I think most are just laughing at the situation as we are being run by someone that either has been rejected by a number of choices, or has taken 2 months to appoint someone/start discussions with someone.
You still here? Thought you were supporting [sic] someone else?
 
Back