• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

Do you honestly think that once she comes back that she is ever leaving again?

This. Slippery slope.

In any case, wouldn't we need Bangladesh to change their stance to be able to deport her, even if we won the case? So doesn't this decision potentially pave the way to us being stuck with her in any event?
 
Michael Gove’s speeches are refreshing. The UK cabinet office minister quotes Gramsci and W.H. Auden. He doesn’t use terms like “zap”, “slightly bonkers” and “squash the sombrero”. He demands to be taken seriously. “Politicians like me,” Mr Gove said in his Ditchley annual lecture last month, “must take responsibility for the effect of their actions and the consequences of their announcements.”

It’s an interesting idea, and I wonder what it means in practice. Let’s imagine a group of politicians — call them Vote Leave — promise we can leave the EU and still have “free trade with minimal bureaucracy”. Let’s imagine that, four years later, the government builds a 27-acre lorry park in Kent, for customs checks after the Brexit transition period ends in January. Let’s imagine the government estimates that customs declarations alone will cost companies £7bn a year. That's £135m a week.

This is minimal bureaucracy in the same way that Britain has a minimal coronavirus death toll. What was it Mr Gove said? “Politicians like me must take responsibility.” Yet, when asked about Brexit preparations last Sunday, he replied: “Some of the criticism has come — how can I put this? — there’s an element of Captain Hindsight

From the FT


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
 
See the EU grants went through today, doesn't look like the money is too accountable. Poland who are one of the better performing countries covid wise are in line to receive 37 billion euros due to the abject formula being used for it.
 
See the EU grants went through today, doesn't look like the money is too accountable. Poland who are one of the better performing countries covid wise are in line to receive 37 billion euros due to the abject formula being used for it.
What is the abject formula?
 
Why didn’t MI5 get involved?
Alamy_A14A69-c-29b8790.jpg
 
Why didn’t MI5 get involved?


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app

From the report:

"The issue of defending the UK’s democratic processes and discourse has appeared to be something of a ‘hot potato’, with no one organisation recognising itself as having an overall lead."

Also:
"Accountability is an issue in particular – whilst the Foreign Secretary has responsibility for the NCSC [National Cyber Security Centre], which is responsible for incident response, the Home Secretary leads on the response to major cyber incidents. Indeed, there are a number of other Ministers with some form of responsibility for cyber – the Defence Secretary has overall responsibility for Offensive Cyber as a ‘warfighting tool’ and for the National Offensive Cyber Programme, while the Secretary of State for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) leads on digital matters, with the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster being responsible for the National Cyber Security Strategy and the National Cyber Security Programme. It makes for an unnecessarily complicated wiring diagram of responsibilities."
 
See the EU grants went through today, doesn't look like the money is too accountable. Poland who are one of the better performing countries covid wise are in line to receive 37 billion euros due to the abject formula being used for it.

What? You mean you actually want us to pay back some of this money you're giving us?! What an utterly outrageous, offensive suggestion...
 
Last edited:
Michael Gove’s speeches are refreshing. The UK cabinet office minister quotes Gramsci and W.H. Auden. He doesn’t use terms like “zap”, “slightly bonkers” and “squash the sombrero”. He demands to be taken seriously. “Politicians like me,” Mr Gove said in his Ditchley annual lecture last month, “must take responsibility for the effect of their actions and the consequences of their announcements.”

It’s an interesting idea, and I wonder what it means in practice. Let’s imagine a group of politicians — call them Vote Leave — promise we can leave the EU and still have “free trade with minimal bureaucracy”. Let’s imagine that, four years later, the government builds a 27-acre lorry park in Kent, for customs checks after the Brexit transition period ends in January. Let’s imagine the government estimates that customs declarations alone will cost companies £7bn a year. That's £135m a week.

This is minimal bureaucracy in the same way that Britain has a minimal coronavirus death toll. What was it Mr Gove said? “Politicians like me must take responsibility.” Yet, when asked about Brexit preparations last Sunday, he replied: “Some of the criticism has come — how can I put this? — there’s an element of Captain Hindsight

From the FT


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app


Ha, ha good ole Antonio Gramsci..."pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will." Brings back memories of uni and modern western Marxism lectures.
 
Full text not been revealed yet but based on economic harm which is hard to judge really - https://www.ft.com/content/2b69c9c4-2ea4-4635-9d8a-1b67852c0322

Spain and Italy get about a third of the grant money between them but their economies have been in long term decline since 2008 really.

Is there anything bad in the detail of this? A plastic tax used to raise some of the money to start paying it back, supporting and stimulating a continent. I don’t get what is so bad?

Similar with the recent Apple Ireland story. On first reading of the headline an EU court has put its oar in and stopped Ireland claiming tax from Apple. The reality is more or less the opposite: the EU commission is sick of Apple, Amazon etc paying no tax - it is ethically unjust and anticompetitive. So the EU Commission tried to use state aid laws to get Apple to pay Ireland back tax. It failed on appeal as the court which looked at the laws ruled it wasn’t ‘state aid’. The EU commission will keep plugging away and find a way to make things more just for the people rather than large digital companies. It has the weight of a continent which is required to take on Apple, Amazon etc.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
 
Full text not been revealed yet but based on economic harm which is hard to judge really - https://www.ft.com/content/2b69c9c4-2ea4-4635-9d8a-1b67852c0322

Spain and Italy get about a third of the grant money between them but their economies have been in long term decline since 2008 really.
I've read a few articles on this now and bar the fact that not enough was ringfenced for the EU 'green new deal' (I'll always say that mind) it seems like the weighting was done largely based on need - 70% determined by a "resilience" rating taking into account population and unemployment and 30% based on how much GDP dropped because of corona. This budget needed 100% buy-in so getting everyone to agree involved compromise across the board. 90 hours of horse-trading has produced this and the commentary I have seen has marked it as a largely positive outcome, with a few caveats. Is that abject? Well, I don't know. Why do you think so?

Using the budget as a political stick against the growing illiberalism in some EU countries was never a card they would or could play.
 
Last edited:
Is there anything bad in the detail of this? A plastic tax used to raise some of the money to start paying it back, supporting and stimulating a continent. I don’t get what is so bad?

Similar with the recent Apple Ireland story. On first reading of the headline an EU court has put its oar in and stopped Ireland claiming tax from Apple. The reality is more or less the opposite: the EU commission is sick of Apple, Amazon etc paying no tax - it is ethically unjust and anticompetitive. So the EU Commission tried to use state aid laws to get Apple to pay Ireland back tax. It failed on appeal as the court which looked at the laws ruled it wasn’t ‘state aid’. The EU commission will keep plugging away and find a way to make things more just for the people rather than large digital companies. It has the weight of a continent which is required to take on Apple, Amazon etc.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Everything you just described is bad.
 
Ergo the UK borrowing to financially support for the UK is bad? Letting huge corporations pay no tax is good? Plastic tax is bad? Are you representing Beelzebub?
The UK borrowing is fine. The UK propping up brickhouse economies like Italy and Greece isn't.

Charging a higher rate of tax to businesses that can literally set up anywhere in the world is also bad.
 
Back