• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Transfer Tittle-Tattle

Whether they technically owe him the money or not, its irrelevant really if he 400% owns the club. He'll logically still want to make a return on his investment, or even just have a return OF his investment, but whether it went in as debt or equity mainly just comes down to tax efficiency
It's a starting point though
 
Whether they technically owe him the money or not, its irrelevant really
Well....... in one scenario, Cheatski FC* is for sale

In the other scenario Cheatski FC* plus £1bn of loans is for sale







*They used to be Chelsea FC and then they changed their name to FC Chelsea or Chelsea Athletics and Football Club or something when they went bankrupt, to avoid having to pay anything to all their debtors and weasel into a transaction with Ken Bates and then Abramovich. CHEATS.
 
Well....... in one scenario, Cheatski FC* is for sale

In the other scenario Cheatski FC* plus £1bn of loans is for sale

If there is one shareholder and one lender to the club, as I believe is the case, then its the same thing.

For example, say someone wanted to pay £500m for the club. If there's no debt then the £500m goes to the one shareholder. If there's £1bn debt, then zero goes to the shareholder and the loan provider (the same person) has to write-down his loan to £500m so that he can sell the club.
 
If there is one shareholder and one lender to the club, as I believe is the case, then its the same thing.

For example, say someone wanted to pay £500m for the club. If there's no debt then the £500m goes to the one shareholder. If there's £1bn debt, then zero goes to the shareholder and the loan provider (the same person) has to write-down his loan to £500m so that he can sell the club.
It's a starting point £1bn to be in the game
 
If there is one shareholder and one lender to the club, as I believe is the case, then its the same thing.

For example, say someone wanted to pay £500m for the club. If there's no debt then the £500m goes to the one shareholder. If there's £1bn debt, then zero goes to the shareholder and the loan provider (the same person) has to write-down his loan to £500m so that he can sell the club.
You imply that in that scenario, Abramovic would walk away with £500m and forget the £500m still owing to him.

I'm saying he would want £1.5bn rather than £0.5bn for his club, his investment.
 
You imply that in that scenario, Abramovic would walk away with £500m and forget the £500m still owing to him.

I'm saying he would want £1.5bn rather than £0.5bn for his club, his investment.

...which isn't the way things usually work. You value a business on a debt/cash free basis, and then work out the implications of the capital structure
 
Been a while since West Ham were our feeder club and it's probably not realistic, but I would really like us to sign Declan Rice.
 
Been a while since West Ham were our feeder club and it's probably not realistic, but I would really like us to sign Declan Rice.

He’s the best player outside of the top 6 in my view if you include potential/age/current ability.

Sadly he’s out of our price range since he signed a new deal
 
Been a while since West Ham were our feeder club and it's probably not realistic, but I would really like us to sign Declan Rice.

Lanzini and Felipe Anderson would be good additions from them too. That said, I cant see them selling to us, and even if they were willing to, the prices would be prohibitive.

We are going to need to be somewhat smart in the market this summer given the number of overseas players which we have coupled with typical prices for English players. Releasing Vorm is a no brainer, and ideally bringing in a young or old English 3rd choice. Sessegnon and Wan Bissaka equally have to be pretty high up the list
 
Lanzini and Felipe Anderson would be good additions from them too. That said, I cant see them selling to us, and even if they were willing to, the prices would be prohibitive.

We are going to need to be somewhat smart in the market this summer given the number of overseas players which we have coupled with typical prices for English players. Releasing Vorm is a no brainer, and ideally bringing in a young or old English 3rd choice. Sessegnon and Wan Bissaka equally have to be pretty high up the list

Why those two full backs?
Both would be prohibitively expensive and are still very raw
Surely we should be aiming for a more finished product for the money they would cost
 
Back