• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Assange

So if they don't request extradition and allow the Swedes to do so, then our courts can decide if they want to send him back to Sweden? The yanks don't care about the rape charges though, they care about getting the guy who embarrassed them with leaks they'd rather were kept a secret. So it is obviously political on their part, unless you really believe their primary motivation is the rule of law (a first time for everything I suppose).

See the article I posted above
 
No, I didn't M8.

My only observation on the line above. Is he if hadn't run he probably thought he was going to end up in Guantanamo.
If they lock him up for the rapes he must serve his time in Sweden.

That's ludicrous. He was facing extradition to Sweden on sexual assault and rape charges. There was no extradition request from the US at that point and if you had read the article, you would know that such a request if far from simple and he would have had many opportunities to challenge it from Sweden.
 
That's ludicrous. He was facing extradition to Sweden on sexual assault and rape charges. There was no extradition request from the US at that point and if you had read the article, you would know that such a request if far from simple and he would have had many opportunities to challenge it from Sweden.

He obviously felt otherwise.
I care little about the man. Let's hope he gets what he deserves from the Swedish side of things.
 
Let hope then he gets whats due.

Let's hope that he stands trial in Sweden and the matter is settled.

One last thing, if we did extradite him to Sweden and the US made a request to extradite him from there, he would be able to challenge the request in Sweden, England and Strasbourg. He is safer there than here.
 
Doesn't it depend which state he is charged in in the US? As we won't agree to extraditions to place that have death penalties? Or something like that.
 
He is an oddball. But you can understand his fear/ paranoia having had the weight of state secretes passing through his hands. People have been assassinated for less.

But he could have faced up to the embarrassment in Sweden almost a decade ago, served his time or fine, and been a free man. Or...skipped out of the embassy in the last 5 years while there was no policeman outside. He would have become an underground cult figure, moved from safe-house to house by partisan supporters.


Sitting on my porcelain throne using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
 
Last edited:
Let's hope that he stands trial in Sweden and the matter is settled.

One last thing, if we did extradite him to Sweden and the US made a request to extradite him from there, he would be able to challenge the request in Sweden, England and Strasbourg. He is safer there than here.
But he's much safer than all of them in an embassy that doesn't have an extradition treaty, right? That article you linked, whilst informative, completely missed that point.

I don't know enough about the rape cases to comment on his innocence or guilt, but if I'd done the rest of the stuff he has, I'd be tucked away in a non-extradition country/embassy too.
 
But he's much safer than all of them in an embassy that doesn't have an extradition treaty, right? That article you linked, whilst informative, completely missed that point.

I don't know enough about the rape cases to comment on his innocence or guilt, but if I'd done the rest of the stuff he has, I'd be tucked away in a non-extradition country/embassy too.

He didn't feel the need to hide in a cupboard until he ran out of legal avenues to avoid extradition to Sweden.
 
He didn't feel the need to hide in a cupboard until he ran out of legal grounds to fight his extradition to Sweden.
I think that's perfectly explainable by the fact that he can pop into an embassy at any point when out of prison. If in prison, he can't do that.

I know that extradition has legal prerequisites, but would you trust your life and/or freedom to them? I've seen enough legal cases wrongly decided - especially in supranational courts - to know that I wouldn't.
 
I think that's perfectly explainable by the fact that he can pop into an embassy at any point when out of prison. If in prison, he can't do that.

I know that extradition has legal prerequisites, but would you trust your life and/or freedom to them? I've seen enough legal cases wrongly decided - especially in supranational courts - to know that I wouldn't.

He should stand trial for the serious offences he is alleged to have committed in Sweden. There is no reason to suspect that he wouldn't receive a fair trial there.
 
He should stand trial for the serious offences he is alleged to have committed in Sweden. There is no reason to suspect that he wouldn't receive a fair trial there.
Again, I wouldn't bet my freedom on there being no extradition or rendition before the case was complete.

It would be unusual but would it be impossible for him to stand trial from the embassy? Seems like a sensible middle ground.
 
Again, I wouldn't bet my freedom on there being no extradition or rendition before the case was complete.

It would be unusual but would it be impossible for him to stand trial from the embassy? Seems like a sensible middle ground.

Rendition seems very unlikely given that he will be in prison whilst the extradition requests go through the court.

I think it highly unlikely that if he was extradited to Sweden, they would give permission for the US to take him before he stood trial or served his time.

He has ample legal grounds to fight extradition from the UK or Sweden to the US and may be successful.
 
Back