• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ITK thread January 2018

I've got some ideas for improving this place @scaramanga


I just decided that COYS wasn't worth the hassle of getting verified.

I think I got as far as trying to sign up, soley to view the ITK thread, and proptly giving up as it was too much hassle.

Is COYS the one where they wanted you to submit a few words explaining your support for the club before being approved?

You literally cant have a disagreement on that forum without getting banned, its ridiculous....

I got banned for questioning the eyesight of another poster when debating a player's qualities. Crazy place.
 
I've long wondered how much of the ITK is "genuine", as in someone has indeed heard something from a source, and how much is just there to drive up traffic and donations.

Looking at said donations Id suggest the latter is much more likely.

Especially considering the turn around in staff at the club. For any of these ITK to have had sources as long as they have they would need to be 'inner circle' types - and clearly (IMO) none of them are likely to be out there blabbing commercially sensitive information.

I can buy the angle some have mates who are agents, something like that, but then the info would be more than just for Spurs. And would have course be less reliable to start with.

Mind you, what am I saying? @Gutter Boy has already confessed to being 6 of them so theres your answer!
 
Looking at said donations Id suggest the latter is much more likely.

Especially considering the turn around in staff at the club. For any of these ITK to have had sources as long as they have they would need to be 'inner circle' types - and clearly (IMO) none of them are likely to be out there blabbing commercially sensitive information.

I can buy the angle some have mates who are agents, something like that, but then the info would be more than just for Spurs. And would have course be less reliable to start with.

Mind you, what am I saying? @Gutter Boy has already confessed to being 6 of them so theres your answer!

I think there is some level of verification at first (you inform the staff where your info is from I guess), but once you're approved you can post whatever you want. Confirming breaking news stories and what other ITKs are saying seems to be the common way of maintaining your status.Vague stuff is even better as that engages the other posters. As long as certain other forums get their donations on the back of it I'm not sure they care.
 
Back