• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics

How can any meritocracy that takes itself seriously have an un democratic upper house? Seriously, almost as embarrassing as having a ninety year old German as head of state.

The life peers (i.e. the last few PMs' chums) are a bit of a joke, but the fact that there are still 92 hereditary peers is absolutely inexcusable. It should be illegal under the Equalities Act for starters, as they pass by primogeniture, which even the crown no longer does.
 
This is neo liberalism at work. The RWNJ'S believe that public medicine is a form of subsidy to British workers and is inconsistent with their concept of 'free trade.'
 
This is neo liberalism at work. The RWNJ'S believe that public medicine is a form of subsidy to British workers and is inconsistent with their concept of 'free trade.'

Big pharmas are about the biggest villains that exist in the world - as bad as arms dealers and bankers.

A morally repugnant cartel that suppresses more-effective but less-profitable treatments and uses unnecessary patents to kill millions

Hopefully out of the clutches of the EU's competition and state aid laws, we'll be able to adopt an independent, evidence-led approach to drug procurement and prescription
 
I wonder if they are throwing it, trust that Corbyn has enough support to keep the leadership, he’ll drive the brexit shambles bus over the cliff anyway, they can then blame the inevitable economic meltdown on labour, “them foreigns that are still here and the bloody remainers who refuse to shoot rainbows out of their butts”.
 
All the talk of the Irish border/customs union. If the EU has free movement of people and there is no hard border between Northern Ireland and The Republic (which is what everyone says they want) and there is no hard border down the Irish Sea (as The DUP -- who keep The Tories in power -- insist can't happen), then how will movement of people work between Britain and Ireland?
 
All the talk of the Irish border/customs union. If the EU has free movement of people and there is no hard border between Northern Ireland and The Republic (which is what everyone says they want) and there is no hard border down the Irish Sea (as The DUP -- who keep The Tories in power -- insist can't happen), then how will movement of people work between Britain and Ireland?

It wont but then again I am not sure that a lot of those funding Brexit actually care about immigration but do care about giving benefits / rights to their workers.
 
All the talk of the Irish border/customs union. If the EU has free movement of people and there is no hard border between Northern Ireland and The Republic (which is what everyone says they want) and there is no hard border down the Irish Sea (as The DUP -- who keep The Tories in power -- insist can't happen), then how will movement of people work between Britain and Ireland?

the long and the short is, we have to have free movement too
 
the long and the short is, we have to have free movement too

Which is the crux of Brexit. People can talk about sovereignty and all the rest of it, but immigration is the issue that swung the vote to leave.

So the hardcore Brexiters like Mogg, Gove, Johnson etc. must know that there has to be a hard border in Ireland to police the movement of people. It's either that or stay in the single market, surely there is no other solution? A soft border won't stop people crossing, so if free movement ends, there has to be a hard border somewhere, surely?

We're gonna end up with Norway plus customs union (they might give this arrangement a different name) or hard brexit, there's no middle ground if free movement is to end. Personally, whilst I think there are issues with free movement, I don't think ending it is worth the aggravation. Labour will slowly drift to the former arrangement imo.
 
Back