• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Women...

My mrs has got the permanent hump with me lately
I literally cannot do one thing right, she is being a proper taco

Can i ask is she touching 40 or just past that age lol,tell you what, once they reach that age everyone is a target ....they look in the mirror see old age approaching,they say men have a mid life crisis...women jesh.... everything gets thrown out!!
 
Can i ask is she touching 40 or just past that age lol,tell you what, once they reach that age everyone is a target ....they look in the mirror see old age approaching,they say men have a mid life crisis...women jesh.... everything gets thrown out!!
Ha! The lady I'm "currently" Dating turned 40 a couple of weeks ago. Hmmmmm.....
 
That's kind of where I'm at.
But then, it is nice to have a cuddle on the sofa from time to time

People are happier in relationships - especially if you get along! I have a kinda system to filter out the ones you're predisposed to get along with, which I will be turning into a new app next year - haha - could be big. :rolleyes:
 
I would imagine its like wine.

You can indulge expensive tastes, and go for a Chateau Margaux 1787, but if you are more financially impaired you can also get a cheap bottle of Blossom Hill.

Either way youre getting fudged.
You can now buy good wine by the glass in some places. They have some clever system that replaces the liquid with Argon so it doesn't go off. That way you get all the benefits of good wine with none of the risk - a bit like hookers
 
Just another load of gonad*s really
If you don't like what marriage means why enter a civil partnership with them

One of the first mixed-sex couples to become civil partners hailed it as a "unique, special and personal moment".

Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, who won a legal battle for the right to heterosexual civil partnerships, celebrated at Kensington and Chelsea Register Office in west London.

Previously, the law only allowed same-sex couples to be civil partners.

About 84,000 mixed-sex couples could form civil partnerships next year, the government says.

Introduced for same-sex couples in 2005, civil partnerships offer almost identical rights as marriage, including property, inheritance and tax entitlements.

After Ms Steinfeld and Mr Keidan won their legal bid at the Supreme Court in 2018 for the right to have a civil partnership instead of a marriage, the rules were changed to make them available to everyone in England and Wales.

The Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill is currently making its way through the Scottish Parliament to make the partnerships legal north of the border.

Speaking on the steps of the register office, Ms Steinfeld said their "personal wish" to form a civil partnership came from a "desire to formalise our relationship in a more modern way, with a focus on equality, and mutual respect".

She said: "So today is a unique, special and personal moment for us, a moment that we've been able to affirm our love and commitment to one another in the company of our beautiful children, Eden and Ariel, and close friends."

Ms Steinfeld said it creates "new, modern possibilities" for thousands of people to express their love and commitment and ends "the unrivalled position of marriage".

She called for "deeper discussions" on giving legal recognition to other kinds of caring relationships, including those between friends, siblings and co-parents.

Mr Keidan said they succeeded in their legal battle "against all odds" but added that their mental health has suffered under the strain.

_98950366_presentational_grey_line464-nc.jpg

_109355871_clivecoleman-nc.png

Five years after being refused permission to give notice of a heterosexual civil partnership, Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan will finally become civil partners today.

Their conscientious objection to marriage and what they saw as its patriarchal associations led to a lengthy legal battle culminating in a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last year that the law was discriminatory and breached their right to a family and private life.

The government changed the law, opening such a union to the majority of the UK's 3.3 million co-habiting heterosexual couples.

Many believe they are already protected by so-called "common law marriages", but these do not exist.

As a result, they do not enjoy the same property, inheritance and tax entitlements as married couples and civil partners.

The government estimates as many as 84,000 mixed sex couples could become civil partners this year, giving them greater rights and protections within their relationships, without having to get married.

_98950366_presentational_grey_line464-nc.jpg

Cathy Brown and John Grisswell, from Wirksworth, Derbyshire, are another mixed-sex couple to go through the civil partnership ceremony on the day it became possible.

They had been married to other people before and wanted an alternative option.

'Patriarchal baggage'
Ms Brown said she and Mr Grisswell felt "strongly" that "repeating those vows and promises, knowing they hadn't worked the first time, wasn't the route we wanted to go down".

Mary Ann Lund and Gareth Wood, from Market Harborough, Leicestershire, also went through a civil partnership ceremony on Tuesday.

"It's more about the equality of a partnership rather than a marriage," Dr Lund said.

"That's something important to us, that we feel there is a kind of historical, patriarchal baggage in marriage and it's not particularly something that's for us."

_110349834_mediaitem110349832.jpg
Image copyrightPA MEDIA
Image captionJulie Thorpe and Keith Lomax are among thousands of opposite sex couples that are set to enter into a civil partnership
Another couple, Julie Thorpe, 61, and Keith Lomax, 70, said they were looking forward to being among the first mixed-sex people to officially enter a civil partnership - but it would not change their relationship "one jot".

The couple from near Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, have been living together for most of their 37-year relationship and have three children.

They will have a civil partnership ceremony at a register office in Halifax.

Ms Thorpe said: "It won't change our relationship one jot. It will not make any difference to how we behave towards each other when we get up the next day.

"We have had a very successful relationship for 37 years and a bit of paper is not going to make any difference to that whatsoever. It does give us some legal protection within that relationship."

Mr Lomax, a human rights lawyer, added: "It is a mutual celebration of all of those and also of the people who actually brought the case to court and changed the law in the first place, because that was a very brave and bold thing to do at considerable financial risk."
 
Just another load of gonad*s really
If you don't like what marriage means why enter a civil partnership with them

One of the first mixed-sex couples to become civil partners hailed it as a "unique, special and personal moment".

Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, who won a legal battle for the right to heterosexual civil partnerships, celebrated at Kensington and Chelsea Register Office in west London.

Previously, the law only allowed same-sex couples to be civil partners.

About 84,000 mixed-sex couples could form civil partnerships next year, the government says.

Introduced for same-sex couples in 2005, civil partnerships offer almost identical rights as marriage, including property, inheritance and tax entitlements.

After Ms Steinfeld and Mr Keidan won their legal bid at the Supreme Court in 2018 for the right to have a civil partnership instead of a marriage, the rules were changed to make them available to everyone in England and Wales.

The Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill is currently making its way through the Scottish Parliament to make the partnerships legal north of the border.

Speaking on the steps of the register office, Ms Steinfeld said their "personal wish" to form a civil partnership came from a "desire to formalise our relationship in a more modern way, with a focus on equality, and mutual respect".

She said: "So today is a unique, special and personal moment for us, a moment that we've been able to affirm our love and commitment to one another in the company of our beautiful children, Eden and Ariel, and close friends."

Ms Steinfeld said it creates "new, modern possibilities" for thousands of people to express their love and commitment and ends "the unrivalled position of marriage".

She called for "deeper discussions" on giving legal recognition to other kinds of caring relationships, including those between friends, siblings and co-parents.

Mr Keidan said they succeeded in their legal battle "against all odds" but added that their mental health has suffered under the strain.

_98950366_presentational_grey_line464-nc.jpg

_109355871_clivecoleman-nc.png

Five years after being refused permission to give notice of a heterosexual civil partnership, Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan will finally become civil partners today.

Their conscientious objection to marriage and what they saw as its patriarchal associations led to a lengthy legal battle culminating in a unanimous Supreme Court ruling last year that the law was discriminatory and breached their right to a family and private life.

The government changed the law, opening such a union to the majority of the UK's 3.3 million co-habiting heterosexual couples.

Many believe they are already protected by so-called "common law marriages", but these do not exist.

As a result, they do not enjoy the same property, inheritance and tax entitlements as married couples and civil partners.

The government estimates as many as 84,000 mixed sex couples could become civil partners this year, giving them greater rights and protections within their relationships, without having to get married.

_98950366_presentational_grey_line464-nc.jpg

Cathy Brown and John Grisswell, from Wirksworth, Derbyshire, are another mixed-sex couple to go through the civil partnership ceremony on the day it became possible.

They had been married to other people before and wanted an alternative option.

'Patriarchal baggage'
Ms Brown said she and Mr Grisswell felt "strongly" that "repeating those vows and promises, knowing they hadn't worked the first time, wasn't the route we wanted to go down".

Mary Ann Lund and Gareth Wood, from Market Harborough, Leicestershire, also went through a civil partnership ceremony on Tuesday.

"It's more about the equality of a partnership rather than a marriage," Dr Lund said.

"That's something important to us, that we feel there is a kind of historical, patriarchal baggage in marriage and it's not particularly something that's for us."

_110349834_mediaitem110349832.jpg
Image copyrightPA MEDIA
Image captionJulie Thorpe and Keith Lomax are among thousands of opposite sex couples that are set to enter into a civil partnership
Another couple, Julie Thorpe, 61, and Keith Lomax, 70, said they were looking forward to being among the first mixed-sex people to officially enter a civil partnership - but it would not change their relationship "one jot".

The couple from near Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, have been living together for most of their 37-year relationship and have three children.

They will have a civil partnership ceremony at a register office in Halifax.

Ms Thorpe said: "It won't change our relationship one jot. It will not make any difference to how we behave towards each other when we get up the next day.

"We have had a very successful relationship for 37 years and a bit of paper is not going to make any difference to that whatsoever. It does give us some legal protection within that relationship."

Mr Lomax, a human rights lawyer, added: "It is a mutual celebration of all of those and also of the people who actually bought the case to court and changed the law in the first place, because that was a very brave and bold thing to do at considerable financial risk."
How could they possibly get attention if they were to just marry?

I think you're looking too hard for a point
 
Back