• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

QU1DWYx.jpg

Dp4CfpTWoAAt63z.jpg
 
I'm still amazed they kept the angled cladding on the sides.

I've seen hundreds of projects that start the way our stadium did and it's always that kind of thing that gets cost engineered out.

Scara you may be right in this respect to other "projects" however the cladding is sitting on a sub frame which makes it a little easier I suppose. I am more surprised that Sissoko was signed
 
Scara you may be right in this respect to other "projects" however the cladding is sitting on a sub frame which makes it a little easier I suppose. I am more surprised that Sissoko was signed
Angled cladding on an angled frame or angled cladding on a flat frame?

It looked to me on the drawings that the frame was flat - that's why I expected flat cladding.
 
Angled cladding on an angled frame or angled cladding on a flat frame?

It looked to me on the drawings that the frame was flat - that's why I expected flat cladding.

Im thinking it is angled frame as the work to fit curved panels would be more difficult. There is enough of a gap to fit flat panels to tilt them.
 
Im thinking it is angled frame as the work to fit curved panels would be more difficult. There is enough of a gap to fit flat panels to tilt them.
Cladding is rarely flat panels - it's usually a built frame so that there's an unseen part to bolt through. I can't see any reason why the cladding couldn't have been made in the shape we have.
 
Back