glory-glory.co.uk

Carling Cup Champions 2007/8

Welcome to glory-glory.co.uk Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Blogs Forums Photos Downloads

Bankrupt's Blog

Reserve Report: Ghaly Returns

NN

Spurs Reserves 2-3 Portsmouth Reserves

 

Line up/formation (ages in brackets):

 

 

-------------------------------Sanchez (37)-----------------------------

 

Smith (17)-------Dervite (20)--------Rocha (29)-------Hughton (19)

 

----------------McKenna (22)-------Maghoma (20)-------------------

 

Hutton (18)--------------------Ghaly (26)-----------------Daniels (22)

 

-------------------------------Taarabt (19)-----------------------------

 

Subs: Butler (16), Berchiche (18), Mtandari (18), Olsen (18), Fraser-Allen (18)

 

Scorers: Daniels, Taarabt

 

The Game

 

Second home game of the season for the reserves, and I know first team coaches Gus Poyet and Hans Leitert were both in attendance, as I passed them on the stairs on the way in (Hans courteously held the door open for me as well, so brownie points for him). The much maligned Damien Comolli was also watching, but I didn’t see Ramos.

 

With a couple of older players who had been absent through season long loan and injury, in Daniels and McKenna respectively, returning and three ‘senior’ players in the starting line up, Spurs suddenly looked quite an old side for this kind of fixture. Portsmouth were the opposition and, some fringe first teamers such as Traore, Little and Jerome Thomas aside, looked disjointed and lacking in quality. Their team was presumably made up largely of younger players, and that disparity in experience and quality between the two sides certainly told, as Portsmouth were rarely in the game, despite the final score not reflecting Spurs' dominance.

 

Overall, this is the best I’ve seen the reserves play for some time. They looked organised, motivated, and played some decent stuff at times. It’s amazing what a few experienced heads can do to a side like this, and is precisely why I keep advocating senior players not getting first team minutes being part of this group. Someone like Adam Smith is going to benefit immensely from having a goalkeeper of Cesar Sanchez’ experience instructing him, for example.

 

Spurs lined up in what was essentially a 4-2-3-1, with Taarabt, somewhat nonsensically, as sole striker. Maghoma and McKenna anchored midfield (Danny Hutchins, impressive in that role so far this season, was there but not in the eleven or named as sub), with David Hutton and Charlie Daniels on either flank, and Hossam ‘back from the dead’ Ghaly given a relatively free role to drop into midfield or support Taarabt. Dervite was captain.

 

Spurs dominated the first half entirely, though the lack of a proper striker hampered them greatly. The first goal came from a good strike from Daniels, teed up by Taarabt from a freekick, and the second from some good interplay between Ghaly and Taarabt, resulting in a speculative shot (one of many) from Taarabt.

 

Daniels managed to undo his contribution of the opening goal by failing to track his man to allow Portsmouth to equalise, and in the second half, Portsmouth managed to nick the two goals that gave them the win through some poor defending, where first Sanchez and then Rocha were exposed as the only line of defence. This was despite the visitors failing to look a genuine threat throughout.

 

The Players

 

There’s only one place to start, and that is with the player I, and I’m sure everyone else, assumed would never be seen in a Spurs shirt ever again – Hossam Ghaly. To put it succinctly, Ghaly was a class above everyone else on the pitch. His work rate was superb. In the first half, he was everywhere, making himself an option for the pass virtually every time a Spurs player had the ball, threw himself into tackles and made intelligent contributions defensively, and looked by far the player most likely to create chances via an incisive through ball or interplay in advanced areas. For the closing stages of the first half, and the whole of the second, Clive Allen instructed him to play up alongside Taarabt, and he continued to make a good contribution from that position – linking well with Taarabt, for the most part, and playing some decent angled through balls to the right to put in Hutton and Smith on several occasions.

 

This of course is a player coming back from injury, who hasn’t played first team football for months, and playing in the stiffs for a club who has shunned him since a moment of petulance brought on by idiotic elements in the crowd. For him to come out and show the effort and enthusiasm he did (this also goes into things like trying to instruct and encourage Taarabt and his other team mates) deserves massive respect, in my opinion. His awareness of players around him, and of tactical requirements in any given situation, was far in advance of any other player on the park, as you’d hope from a Premier League player, and make no mistake, that is what Ghaly is. Anyone who suggests he’s “Championship at best”, “a donkey”, “liability” and so forth, is simply wrong.

 

He should be back in the first team squad. It’s as simple as that. He has several things that we really lack at the moment, not least some balls, aggression and ability to put in a tackle in central midfield, and the confidence and ability to create in the final third.

 

Anyway, sermon over…on to the rest.

 

So Taarabt….the guy is an enigma, and right now, I’d be willing to place a substantial amount of money on him not making it; at least, not at Spurs. His body language says he doesn’t want to be at this club, and Clive Allen seems to take some delight in giving him stick from the sidelines, some of it may be deserved, but it’s pretty clear that this isn’t the coach that is going to take what talent Taarabt does have and convert him into a footballer.

 

As a lone striker, particularly in the first half, he was hopeless. Failing to retain the ball as it was played into, not by over elaborating, but just by poor first touch and anticipation. He did look better when Alex Olsen came on up front and he dropped into a deeper role, and some of his linking with Ghaly did show promise, but he’s so far from having the tactical understanding to match the talent that it’s easy to see why he’s still so far from getting a first team game.

 

Adam Smith was the youngest player in the starting eleven, and despite a few lax moments defensively, had a good game. He linked well with Hutton on the right flank and, once he’s bulked up a bit, could possibly be regarded as prospect for good things.

 

Hutton, as per usual, was a good attacking outlet. His crossing (and general technical ability, as I keep saying) is very good. That didn’t really tell tonight because there was no real target in the box with Taarabt as point man, but Hutton remains one of the few players in this group that you can rely on to consistently beat his man and produce a decent final ball. As I said, he linked well with Smith and the right flank always looked an outlet, in contrast to Hughton and Daniels on the left who failed to show any understanding or consistent threat.

 

A final mention for Sanchez and Rocha, as the other senior players on show. Both sought to provide assistance and leadership to the younger players around them, and whilst neither may have much contribution to make at first team level this season, they could prove very important in the development of what talent we do have at reserve level.

 

The Ratings

 
Sanchez – 66% - Didn’t have a great deal to do, was unlucky with the second goal having made two good stops
Smith – 73% - Looks quite assured at this level
Dervite – 62% - Struggled at times and wasn’t commanding enough
Rocha – 66% - Commits himself too early at times, but looks to be having a positive effect in this group
Hughton – 57% - OK defensively, but no offensive contribution whatsoever
Hutton – 74% - Always looks a threat, but no takers for the service he provides in this kind of system
McKenna – 55% - Reasonably disciplined but lacks quality in the tackle and with the ball at his feet
Maghoma – 67% - I’m not a fan, but he did quite well and got through a decent amount of work box to box
Daniels – 61% - Nice goal, but has the physique of a rugby player and plays football like one
Ghaly – 78% - Impressive attitude, work rate and overall contribution
Taarabt – 68% - Still a work in progress, and sadly it seems like work that only has a chance of being completed at another club

Published Tuesday, October 07, 2008 2:19 PM by bankrupt

Comments

 

Gustav0 said:

Brilliant report Bankrupt. More please.

October 7, 2008 2:42 PM
 

ukspursbloke said:

Niceone mate, shame Bostock wasn't involved but nice to see Ghaly involved again

October 7, 2008 3:10 PM
 

Papercut said:

Would love to see Ghaly involved again but imagine the stick if he is played and we still lose.

October 7, 2008 8:14 PM
 

Maccadinho said:

Seems like such a fair account, Bankrupt. Really fair. And realistic.

More please if you can.  

October 8, 2008 1:49
 

nw7 yid said:

Fascinating report Bankrupt - good work.

Only issue that I have is that if Ghaly was, as you suggested, head and shoulders above his teammates, why did he only get rated as 4-5% above the likes of Hutton and Smith?  Either those two did bloody well too, or you need to refine your percentage rating system!

October 8, 2008 12:11 PM
 

bankrupt said:

Re: Ghaly rating - basically because I knew if I gave him a particularly high rating, people would automatically dismiss it, and probably everything else I said about him.

But yes, it's a fair point - the ratings are rathered clustered, which is precisely what I hope to avoid in using percentages. Still better than marks out of ten, etc. but will attempt to tweak them in future.

October 8, 2008 2:57 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled
Powered by Community Server (Personal Edition), by Telligent Systems